Ruck & Maul 101
Allen Oxlade (6)
From that 20s trial, has there been a Gen Blue squad finalized/named ??
I don't really care, it could be the district clubs, the ARU, NSWRU, how much are we really talking about 100,000, pass a hat around after the next Wallaby loss and the players can throw in 5k of their 10k match fee, job done.
All I care about is getting more players exposed to high level rugby. The bigger the pool of players, the more depth you have.
The problem we have is that basically the same players have been receiving extra coaching since day dot, they get coached to play how the powers to be want them to play, so the are better coached, have better fitness and their skills are more refined hence they continue to get picked. That doesn't make them better rugby players, it just makes them puppets to the system. More exposure to more players that is all I want.
So what's the difference between school rugby and Colts?
Besides the fact that the new Colts players will be competing against players a year older than them, what else?
I think one of the major differences is you may have to play 24 weeks straight - 3 trials, 18 comp games and 3 finals with no weeks off - although I hear there may be 1 week off this year. School boys rarely play more than 6 weeks before school holidays break it up.
IMO the top teams in Colts 1 is a fair jump up in standard from school First XV. The top teams have good rugby players in every position.
Also the crowds are not very big.
Players and parents can have a beer after the game at the ground.
Players and parents can have a beer after the game at the ground.
Absolutely. Many, many players struggle in their first year of colts having to back up week in week out for up to 24 weeks. It's a physical and mental test for them.I think one of the major differences is you may have to play 24 weeks straight - 3 trials, 18 comp games and 3 finals with no weeks off - although I hear there may be 1 week off this year. School boys rarely play more than 6 weeks before school holidays break it up.
You're only as good as your last game ..........A major difference is that player performance is reviewed weekly.
I think one of the major differences is you may have to play 24 weeks straight - 3 trials, 18 comp games and 3 finals with no weeks off - although I hear there may be 1 week off this year. School boys rarely play more than 6 weeks before school holidays break it up.
IMO the top teams in Colts 1 is a fair jump up in standard from school First XV. The top teams have good rugby players in every position.
Also the crowds are not very big.
Players and parents can have a beer after the game at the ground.
Having coached this age group, blokes don't know what to do with themselves around game 15. Often the motivation dies down until finals time (or completely if you're not going to make finals).
It's a lot of football for them.
any news on coaching movements for 2017? I'm led to believe that eastwood have axed the head coach after one season. Also Gordon coaches possibly moving to grade.
Also heard that Greg Marr has moved from 1st grade at the Rats to colts. Not sure if that's Colts 1 or as Colts Club coach.
Uni won the colts1 grand final in 2015,together with 2nd & 3rd grades,so Randwick's "success" then is equivocal .Wix haven't achieved much GF success in recent times across the grades, apart from 2015 Colts 1, despite what appears to be rather significant investment in and recruitment of players from outside the Eastern Suburbs/Randwick postcodes.
An adjustment to Coaching staff is the usual response from any Board in that situation.
The Shoremen have been playing some pretty good Colts footy across all three grades in recent times particularly when you consider that they have the skinniest roster of all 12 clubs, and very few former Aust Schoolboy RockStar recruits. Any club receiving former coaches from there will be getting a good bargain. A minor turnover/refresh of Coaching staff is often healthy for a club with a solid culture. It may not all be doom and gloom for the Shoremen.