D-Box
Cyril Towers (30)
Not after the other team has completely rucked past the initial scuffle for the ball.To be fair to White it was a line ball call who was in possession
Not after the other team has completely rucked past the initial scuffle for the ball.To be fair to White it was a line ball call who was in possession
IMO the Force should have just copied it. Honestly, the caterpillar ruck thing has been around long enough for every team to know how to exploit it - as offensive to the eyes as it is.Well that was tough to watch at the end. In the back of my head I felt that would happen at the death and as soon as the kick left Godwin's hands I knew we had lost.
Can someone talk me through how the Brumbies post up to allow the half back to box kick and are not penalised?
They stand about 1/2meters back from the defence line directly in front of the kicker creating a shield for the half back who is kicking. I have no issue with this until they play the man trying to rush the halfback. this happened at every ruck where a box kick occured the pillars physically played (not just standing there blocking the path) the incoming player stoping them from getting near the halfback. Should have been a penalty everytime for mine for obstruction. If they just stand there I have no problem. I really don't like the caterpillar rucks.
Bring on the rebels next week.
Beale (;Who will be the Wallabies fullback is a question that doesn’t have any answers after todays game.
The brumbies players taking out the force defenders trying to get to the halfback 100% happened multiple times in a very blatant manner. Baffled me how it wasnt called. The caterpillar rucks shit, but somehow legal and used semi-regularly.Well that was tough to watch at the end. In the back of my head I felt that would happen at the death and as soon as the kick left Godwin's hands I knew we had lost.
Can someone talk me through how the Brumbies post up to allow the half back to box kick and are not penalised?
They stand about 1/2meters back from the defence line directly in front of the kicker creating a shield for the half back who is kicking. I have no issue with this until they play the man trying to rush the halfback. this happened at every ruck where a box kick occured the pillars physically played (not just standing there blocking the path) the incoming player stoping them from getting near the halfback. Should have been a penalty everytime for mine for obstruction. If they just stand there I have no problem. I really don't like the caterpillar rucks.
Bring on the rebels next week.
Hodge and Banks both had pretty crappy games. Campbell looked pretty good, but still dont know if he is up to test standard. Could JOC (James O'Connor) be an option there?Who will be the Wallabies fullback is a question that doesn’t have any answers after todays game.
NoHodge and Banks both had pretty crappy games. Campbell looked pretty good, but still dont know if he is up to test standard. Could JOC (James O'Connor) be an option there?
I would also like to see more of McIntyre as thought he was very sharp in his 14 minutes. Could yet guzump pasitoa as starting 10 and saw glimpses of good form he showed in France.Disappointing result, but very promising signs for the force. They looked the better team.
That forward pass call was a travesty and how the brumbies didn't have a yellow card or two in the first half between the Swain late hit, white holding onto the ball on the wrong side of the ruck 2m out from the line, then taking out a player off the ball from an offside position and the white swinging haymaker to the player on the ground was somewhat incredulous.
Force attacked looked so much better than last year. The contrast was night and day really. Even McIntyre looked good. I expected a drubbing at the hands of the brumbies as is normally the case, so bodes well for the season to come.
Good to see Tom Wright back in some form as well. That one handed pick up was crazy good. Throwing the ball at Anstee after his try was a bad look though
what's the reasoning? he played at fullback more often then not when overseas, particularly at London Irish. He is a very solid defender, great kicker, great passer. If hes good under the high ball i dont see problem with it. he wouldnt have played much more footy at 10 than other positions so i dont think positional familiarity is a reasonable excuse.
He’s got no speed. Have you watched him lately? He’s a playmaking 10. If he makes a break, it’s a half one and he needs support. He’ll pose no attacking threat at the back.what's the reasoning? he played at fullback more often then not when overseas, particularly at London Irish. He is a very solid defender, great kicker, great passer. If hes good under the high ball i dont see problem with it. he wouldnt have played much more footy at 10 than other positions so i dont think positional familiarity is a reasonable excuse.
That pass from fines to koteka that would have been a try gets called forward.
A quiet word from the ref on the run to each player was required.Nothing in ever of it.. late knee sliding and a bit of come on with the ball throw.. both not needed but still nothing to write about
Campbell from the RedsWho will be the Wallabies fullback is a question that doesn’t have any answers after todays game.
nah I don’t think so, ball left his hands backwards.Because...
It was forward.
Yes, and if Donaldson locks down the #10 spot at the Tahs then Harrison will almost certainly be fullback. He could be one to watch as his game is probably more suited there and offers a second playmaking option from there, meaning Rennie can just pick centres in the centres. However I recall a discussion from last year that to be an international fullback you have to be about 6'8" whenever a name was put forward to unseat Banks. Plus will be watching the proceedings re Petaia with interest.Campbell from the Reds