Maulalltheway
Tom Lawton (22)
neville also far more likely to stay on the fieldSwain is better than Neville, I think. But I guess Neville is the Brumbies primary caller?
neville also far more likely to stay on the fieldSwain is better than Neville, I think. But I guess Neville is the Brumbies primary caller?
how about he didnt play a minute of trial footy? so is likely being worked back in. i think you are clutchingSlipper and White aren’t comparable to Lolesio.
White and Slipper and almost guaranteed to play big parts in the RWC, veterans and almost played every test year.
Lolesio is none of those. Could be wrong but I doubt this is squad rotation.
Nic White and Noah Lolesio will also start from the reserves, with White to make his 100th appearance when called upon.
The plan to start the Wallabies pair off the bench had been in place for a couple of weeks according to Larkham, who instead opted to start Australia A captain Ryan Lonergan and new recruit Jack Debreczeni.
I said during Shute shield that Debreczeni could be a bolter for the wallabies and I still think it could happen. Being coached by Larkham and behind that forward pack will give him a great opportunity.
From a Wallaby perspective it seems most likely to me he is competing with Samu for the bench impact role. Not saying that played any part in the decision making from Coleman here, but it seems a good move from a Wallaby fan perspective.So I guess Gamble is being played at 8?
What a shock. Coach says nice things about his player in game week.Larkham talks up Debreczeni a fair bit in this article: https://wwos.nine.com.au/rugby/news...-preview/154fefd1-bb57-4d31-9d3c-09cff0c623ff
I reckon there is absolutely zero chance.I said during Shute shield that Debreczeni could be a bolter for the wallabies and I still think it could happen. Being coached by Larkham and behind that forward pack will give him a great opportunity.
Interesting to see the continued ascendance of 10s who attempt to manage games as opposed to win them on their own
Lynagh, Jack, Noah & Edmed all broadly fit into that style of 10
It wasn't a critique, just an observation, but it does have clear game plan changes as we go forwardAs opposed to who???
I was thinking that, add in JOC (James O'Connor) and Donaldson to that list probably Foley as well, the only one we had who was like that was Quade but even he has switched to being more of manage a game typeAs opposed to who???
It wasn't a critique, just an observation, but it does have clear game plan changes as we go forward
but who were the ones that just tried to win it on their own? I genuinely can't work out who you are thinking of?