Good, thanks KOB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears that a long arm transfer involves the catcher passing the ball to a player not bound to the maul. If that player then elects to run the ball, or pass it on, then there is no obstruction, but if he joins the maul after taking the ball it is a penalty for obstruction. Is that your understanding?
I have to say I have no idea of where Miller was when he took the ball but I'm sure I'll see any number of replays on various threads over the next couple of days. Did you, or anyone else, specifically note that he wasn't bound at the time?
I would be surprised, but I'm not disputing it in the absence of supporting evidence, that the Brumbies being the best drilled maul exponents in the competition would have made such an error. I do note, however, that nearly all referees have turned a blind eye to players getting in front of the catcher as the maul forms which is a fairly blatant example of obstruction in the maul.
Nevertheless, the Brumbies won and top the competition and now host the final. I have to say I am satisfied with the way they have gone about their work.