molman
Jim Lenehan (48)
its only an obstruction when the player completely tackles the wrong player, mcgregor eventually knew he made a mistake and tackled the right player and Pinkus was already not in the line of sight, not an obstruction..if mcgregor had committed to tackling pinkus, it was an obstruction, but he didn't , he eventually tackled the right one so not seen as obstruction.
No. The law is;
A player must not intentionally prevent an opponent from tackling or attempting to tackle the ball-carrier.
Mcgregor's looking to start to tackle Pincus as he came across is immaterial and not a factor of the law.
Pincus had an impact on Mcgregor's ability to tackle hence it is an obstruction. People rile because it likely wouldn't have had an impact in reality (ie. Orr would have gone over you'd expect), but teams have own the consequences when they are having these plays that have players running dummy lines right at or into the space between defenders.