molman
Jim Lenehan (48)
I reckon the Force wouldve taken that match with a little more depth.
... or just a little more time for the new players to settle in, especially when one is your 10.
I reckon the Force wouldve taken that match with a little more depth.
Yeah - good points and I didn’t mean to diminish their performances. Agree they were both very good - but LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) really seems to be our go to man in the pack for big metres. He might carry high but you can’t argue with his impact, metre gain or work rate. And a couple of key line out steals to boot. Turning out to be a cracking player.ASY (Angus Scott-Young) seemed to go ok, didn’t hurt the lineout too much. I thought Tualima’s footwork at the line was pretty good in the last 10.
The Force could be showing the way of the future. Bringing in some non eligable Wallabies players to bolster their stocks and make a competative team. I'd be happy to watch that calibre of rugby every weekFuck cutting a team.
Thorn looked like he had the Reds playing a League defensive pattern with the outside men continually jamming in.
id love to know what the force would look like now had they stayed in the comp. no fear rugby at its best.
Thorn looked like he had the Reds playing a League defensive pattern with the outside men continually jamming in.
All rugby fans in the West agree with you.
Equalizer- I suspect the preference is for inclusion with the rest of Australia, but with constitutional reforms and a seat at the table. GRR is the back-up plan if those criteria aren't met.
The Force could be showing the way of the future. Bringing in some non eligable Wallabies players to bolster their stocks and make a competative team. I'd be happy to watch that calibre of rugby every week
Well Wessels would probably have been coaching rather than Sampson so no guarantees.