If there are subs coming on for players who are injured and never were on the field in the first place it seems strange a club wouldn’t have removed them before/during the game unless there was an intention to qualify them for finals but certainly there is room for human error during what is always a hectic time. Looking forward to hosting Newport Saturday. Bar Fridges will be overstocked for the occasion!Im not sure how you stack First grade? Isnt stacking by its nature designed to allow higher grade players to qualify for lower grade comps come finals time? Im not close to it but I think they were expecting a return from injury and they pulled out late. Other than an oversight I cant see any malcious or "sinister" outcome. I'll let the conspiracy theorists run with this one as I'm none the wiser.
Time for the Subbies judiciary to hand back their judiciary cards. Their inconsistency with punishments is ridiculous.
Check out the footage of the first grade game between Briars and Hawkesbury Valley and tell me that only warrants 5 weeks. What a joke!
The whole game or something specific?
Just had a look.Time for the Subbies judiciary to hand back their judiciary cards. Their inconsistency with punishments is ridiculous.
Check out the footage of the first grade game between Briars and Hawkesbury Valley and tell me that only warrants 5 weeks. What a joke!
How in gods earth did the 17 stay on the fieldJust had a look.
Thats pretty horrific, should be minimum season ending.
Was just a bit of push and shove mateHow in gods earth did the 17 stay on the field
I have been carded for lessWas just a bit of push and shove mate
No rumour dropping. Just fact. I've seen longer suspensions for much less. Mitigating circumstances, the guy had his back turned so I didn't punch him as flush as I could have,I assume a red card incident, based on it being related to judiciary. There is a card on the scoresheet.
Not like the Woodsman to just ram in here, drop a rumour, and then trot out again
How in gods earth did the 17 stay on the field
No rumour dropping. Just fact.
Let the boys play!Fair enough. I should have said "criticism" in this case.
Given you know the length of the sentence, I can only assume you have access to the Thursday list, or know someone who does.
I definitely have seen the list as in my role as Club Secretary, so my take:
* It is 6 competition rounds, in effect, from the date of the offence, based on what's stated.
* The recommended mid-range penalty for striking in the ops manual and under WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) recommendations is "6 weeks", so is not inconsistent with other findings.
https://rugbyresults.fusesport.com/ResDetail.asp?id=16980&OrgID=132&menu=637
https://www.world.rugby/organisation/governance/regulations/reg-17/appendix-1
As with the Board, anyone who thinks they can do a better job than the current Judiciary is welcome to put down their clipboard and volunteer.
Fair enough. I should have said "criticism" in this case.
Given you know the length of the sentence, I can only assume you have access to the Thursday list, or know someone who does.
I definitely have seen the list as in my role as Club Secretary, so my take:
* It is 6 competition rounds, in effect, from the date of the offence, based on what's stated.
* The recommended mid-range penalty for striking in the ops manual and under WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) recommendations is "6 weeks", so is not inconsistent with other findings.
https://rugbyresults.fusesport.com/ResDetail.asp?id=16980&OrgID=132&menu=637
https://www.world.rugby/organisation/governance/regulations/reg-17/appendix-1
As with the Board, anyone who thinks they can do a better job than the current Judiciary is welcome to put down their clipboard and volunteer.
as opposed to personal bias against clubs.