RedsHappy
Tony Shaw (54)
....With our hard pitches we get more of a premium from running with the ball in hand and less from scrummaging; so we are better at running with the ball and not so good in the scrums. When our blokes have to scrummage on wet soil they can get a bit lost as studs swim around, whereas Pom scrums are trained to get everything steady as if a bomb would go off after their ball has been fed. On your ball they will try a bit of havoc but they know how to do it in the environment - like a good clay court tennis player hitting a winner with his feet still sliding.....
Lee: just apropos the above and the whole subject of 'Test/RWC selections for varying physical conditions' (a parameter not often referenced here, certainly in the last month or so), this comment from Toby Robson from NZ is a poignant reminder of certain key possibilities we may be faced with:
...."It's been fascinating to watch the rise and rise of the Queensland Reds this season, and it was notable that they ran the Blues, then the Crusaders, off their feet at Suncorp.
But Graham Henry will not be hitting the panic button just yet.
The Rugby World Cup won't be played on a hard, fast Brisbane pitch (thankfully, considering the depth of talent in the Australian backs).
It'll play out in the conditions we'll see during the NPC – cold, wet New Zealand winter nights where workrate, tenacity and an ability to sniff out opportunities will be the difference."....
See: '(NZ) Selectors give cold shoulder to excitement'
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/5264381/Selectors-give-cold-shoulder-to-excitement