wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Winners are grinners etc etcyeah but ya didnt
Winners are grinners etc etcyeah but ya didnt
Nah not a Brit.Is Derpus a Pommy? Geez the bloke can whinge. Your typical keyboard warrior.
My observations of the game:
• Coleman needs to select a specialist 15.
• Edmed offers absolutely nothing in attack. He fails to spark the backline. He is hampering Foketi and Perese’s attacking prowess.
• Not selecting Gamble to start is a fail.
• The Tahs attacking breakdown is killing us.
• Nadolo’s recruitment has to be questioned. Especially considering we let James Ramm go.
• Carter Gordon was impressive particularly in the 2nd half. He just needs to be more consistent for the full 80mins.
• Rebels attacked with good width unlike the Tahs.
• Hardwick was a thorn in the Waratahs side all night.
• Stacey Ili was my Man of the Match
Yeah and the Rebels should be 3 and 0 not 1 and 2. But that's how this game goes.We should have won this one
Yeah it's funny reading the comments. I didn't actually think the Waratah's were entirely as awful some people seem to be making out or the Rebels entirely as great as others. Both teams had some good elements and things they'll look back on in review and be unhappy about. That game could have easily gone either way pretty easily, though to be clear, the Rebels deserved the win.We should have won this one
17 min, Nadolo failed to ground the ball in the corner. Dylan Pietsch or Jorgensen would have scored
20 min, Gleeson's not try by centimeters
After that 2 tries in a row and you know the ending
You don't see any value to a short passing game?Rebels played more effective rugby and deserved their win.
The Tahs are still showing little cohesion and a game plan that doesn't seem well thought out
I don't see the value of random kicks up the middle with no chase and no defensive line possible because the kicker doesn't put a defensive line on side
I don't see the value in all these short passes being used every time
I don't see the value of starting Nadolo, he can't turn and chase, just no
I don't see the backs working as a unit
and wtf was happening to the lineout
Everything you said…Rebels played more effective rugby and deserved their win.
The Tahs are still showing little cohesion and a game plan that doesn't seem well thought out
I don't see the value of random kicks up the middle with no chase and no defensive line possible because the kicker doesn't put a defensive line on side
I don't see the value in all these short passes being used every time
I don't see the value of starting Nadolo, he can't turn and chase, just no
I don't see the backs working as a unit
and wtf was happening to the lineout
No, the Tahs really shouldn't have. They were clearly outplayed pretty much all game. To lose by only 7 was as good a result as they deserved.We should have won this one
17 min, Nadolo failed to ground the ball in the corner. Dylan Pietsch or Jorgensen would have scored
20 min, Gleeson's not try by centimeters
After that 2 tries in a row and you know the ending
You don't see any value to a short passing game?
But that’s only illegal if he’s tackles. Ironically the same thing just happened in the Blues game. Absolutely no mention of it being an issue.If he got to his feet and then propelled himself (even using his knees) it would've been fine, that's the difference. To my eyes (and the refs and commentary) he didn't, he used his knee to propel himself.
Yes, like I said, some execution work ons, but it doesn't mean it doesn't have value. They'll refine their approach. I could see some sense to it for this game, some big boys in that Rebels team, but the execution and decision making as you bemoan was a little rough at times. I also think if you go back and watch the game it wasn't used to Ill effect as much as you think.It is a nice to have as a weapon
It loses it's value when it used every time, like anything
It loses value without the maxim "don't f*ckin pass it to someone in a worse position than you" stamped on every players forehead
It loses value when it limits player ability to properly cleanout because they are too focused on catching another short pass
They can’t leave their feet and dive on him. But they can make contact which means, at that point he has one dynamic movement. If no one does that and the original contact isn’t deemed a tackle he can crawl, roll or do the worm down the field if he is so inclined to my understanding of the rules.Yeah.. A defender can tackle a player who is standing up, they can't tackle a player who is still on the ground rolling/crawling to the tryline.
Nah - you’re just a bit of a grump. I do think it wouldn’t hurt you to make the odd positive comment but you’re here and you’re a rugby fan and this is a rugby forum so post what you like I guess.Nah not a Brit.
I am, however, a piece of shit.
Yeah, he looked to be struggling but he was originally supposed to be out with damaged ribs but got the very late call up when Botha pulled out so I don't think it was fitness per se,Individually, I question whether Holtz is fit enough, he seems absolutely gassed after 15 minutes
Yeah, he looked to be struggling but he was originally supposed to be out with damaged ribs but got the very late call up when Botha pulled out so I don't think it was fitness per se,
In your opinion, but I find it quite hilarious hearing a huge crown roar when stadiums are empty. And I’m not your mate.43k at Suncorp tonight for Broncos-Cowboys. It's not funny, mate. Not funny
In your opinion, but I find it quite hilarious hearing a huge crown roar when stadiums are empty. And I’m not your mate.