i honestly don't think the game was that bad. I just watched it again and honestly there where section of the wallabies play in the second half which was very impressive.
Besides that awful 5 minute period we were in the game for most of it. But in the second half genia came on and took control.
My main observation is that i was impressed with Quade, he has really lifted his physicality and was sprinting in to a few rucks and hitting them without hesitation. Some of his defence was off the chain as well.
My other thought was that the scum has improved a lot but still not where we want.
I honestly don't think the team is that bad there are some teething issues but i think that overtime they will iron themselves out. The things that are killing us most isn't the fact that other teams are better players but simply operating set piece and the such more clinically. Once the teams confidence grows we won't look so worried a times and add few of our injured players in and things look ay okay.
My only question is would it be worthwhile to play without a bonafide 7 against the springboks and just play another 6? I think Hooper looked good at the end when things opened up but at the beginning when teams are ironing each other out he struggled at times i thought but i still think he is of starting calibre.
end of essay
Lilo has to start, he is our only goalkicker. I hope beyond hope that JOC (James O'Connor) will have worked his way back into favour by the time of the northern tour.
But no-one makes them do it. McKenzie has coveted that national coaching postion for at least 3 years (probably more). He's also quite well paid.Are we that much better talent spotters and developers than full time prefessionals?
Not only is it their job to watch and analyse the games and player performances in them but they have typically have two sessions per day hands on with the cattle that us humble keyboard selectors don't have. They also have a full bevy of full time professional assistants and analysts to provide advice and bounce ideas off before deciding who plays where to suit their game plan, and assessment of opposition strengths and weaknesses.
Meanwhile we have foxtel IQ, you tube, and a keyboard to help us make our selections. We can also hide behind the anonomity of our avatar when some of our more "inspired" selections do not come off.
Who would want to be a selector (or National Coach)?
Building nicely for RWC 15. Problems at #9 if they can't rely on FdP otherwise pretty sound across the field, with some good young bulls coming through from the U20 programme.
Fickle pommie weather may stop their charge in 15 but little else.
Yeh I am believing more and more that it will be the pumas first win in the RC. They won't get a better chance for years to come.
They have a great chance to take the RC. They would almost have to go in favourites at home.
Some great young talent coming through and just pure beasts in the pack.
It's an indictment of the ARU that there aren't many options. Almost every super rugby player in Australia has been in ARU elite programmes since they were 15 or 16 and yet there are so many glaring fundamental deficiencies apparent. Scrummaging, kicking from hand, passing both ways etc.I assume HJs point is that there are no or very few options.
If so I agree.
This pain will not go away unless and until the ARU address the grass roots: it doesn't matter how good folau is, he's a single player who's salary would buy a lot of development of multiple players.
Great post and I agree with all of it apart from the bit I quoted.3. As good a player as Michael Hooper can be he is far too small to make the impact required of a 7 in present day international rugby - he's barely bigger than some of the 9's playing at international level.