K
KAOPointman
Guest
No objectivity??? Is that why I included all his try involvements....and made comment they were GOOD movements?I think the last line from KAOPointman's review of Foley's performance from this match is why everyone thinks his opinions are, to put it very politely, not worth reading.
"For me.once again a terrible overall display for a playmaker"
Why would anyone take them seriously or think they show any objectivity whatsoever when the takeaway from a strong performance by the Wallabies at a difficult venue where as the 10, Foley set up all 3 tries and had perfect goal kicking was that?
It's a long rant after every game where it is clear the objective is to say how bad Foley was with absolutely no regard to anything else.
Your TOTALY missing the point of my personal opinion of his overall game. As a "PLAYMAKER".... Yes he helped score 3 tries and kicked conversion very well, despite conveersions having nothing to do with any on field position....he ALSO as our PLAYMAKER threw forward passes, knocked the ball on, missed half a dozen tackles...half our teams 1st half tally, kicked away wasting adv numerous times along with a terrible kicking display(bar his restart kicks).
It is not a rant...it is a fair assessment, BOTH good and bad game involvements noted for the guy who is running the Wallabies Attack! Just because you don't like my opinion, doesn't make it worthless. The form of a player is NOT judged simply by what they do right in a game. It should involve ever point in the game they have an impact! If any poster here reading THAT can't understand that....then you probably should go watch rugby league!