Maulalltheway
Tom Lawton (22)
Mate didn’t we have a game of rugby every week before Brumbies affiliation. I was under the impression that individual clubs sorted player insurance. What rep pathways. Even the players in this zone aren’t interested in your rep pathways. What percentage of registration fees go to ACT affiliation. I haven’t graced the stateroom at Romano’s for a SIRU AGM. Isn’t that the same establishment that is the major sponsor of the one team succeeding better than the rest. I don’t know if it’s still there but isn’t the Romanos building where the Brumbies office was for a long time. I don’t know what you mean when you say zero affiliation. Don’t we all have a common bond - we play rugby.
We had games prior. Governed by NSW rugby then. By the way, how stable is the central west competition. Really stable, never changes hey.
You talked self governance that doesn’t read NSW country, it reads independent.
RA organises insurances at a union level. Each player pays it through their fees to RA. From memory around $100 goes to RA (insurance and levies) and $50 to ACT (development)
I’d also tread carefully with the inference re Romano’s, ACT rugby and the tahs mate. Unless you’re willing to go on the record. Otherwise it just sounds like sour grapes.
The rep pathway which has seen 15+ of our players selected to play NSW country annually and 5+ of our players have been selected/poached to premier clubs in Canberra post rep football and one of our brightest was selected to the schoolboys champs via our club and rep programs. I’m again, really not sure what more you want, maybe Griffiths finest being selected for the wallabies like the good old days in the 60s. Obviously your previous moaning re rep is ignored now. Also, watch this space re rep.
Please clear it up for me. What more do you want and why is it ACT rugby’s fault