Maulalltheway
Tom Lawton (22)
I can understand the conflict regarding the forfeited Griffith games. However it is difficult to understand your mention of Group 20 Francis. Curgenven plays half a season of Group 9 mungo - doesn't qualify for the rah rah finals - but then again he does. How many of James' former Blues team mates from this year will be lining up with the Bulls. That's ridiculous to question the Black's players eligibility. On what grounds?
pretty fair question i reckon.
Forfeit 2s due to lack of numbers. Win 1sts then trot said 1st grade winners out in 2s finals.
i personally feel that if you are short on numbers and players play both 2s and 1s your recorded match as far as eligibility is concerned should be the highest grade you started that day... Not the lowest.
its a stitch up of grand proportions and had the blacks not forfeited the last 2 2nd grade games it wouldn't be nearly as fishy.
Drawing James Curgenven into a discussion about the form of Griffith is deflective at best. If i'm not mistaken Chris Latu required clearance the season he won a Grand Final and a best on ground medal playing for Griffith.
The biggest point here is Griffiths use of forfeits in the last 2 rounds doesn't pass the pub test in any way shape of form.