WorkingClassRugger
Michael Lynagh (62)
I actually spitball this kind of of idea with my mate all the time (but obviously not including a "combined states" team because with adults that's infeasible).
The question is, do we need to expose players to Super Rugby scouts or do we need to develop players? A short tournament with 3-5 games would do plenty to expose and test our up and coming talent for recruitment reasons but I don't think I'd do much for personal development that the academy system of yesteryear couldn't do.
I guess one has to ask, do we want a 3rd tier for entertainment, development, or recruitment? All good reasons and all would factor into any plan, but we still need to decide which we deem more important than others.
I look at it as more a development issue that comes with an entertainment aspect to it. If you consider my suggestion above, if you brought in teams from Mel, Perth and the ACT along with all the NSW based players in the Shield, you would have I believe a highly competitive competition with a high density of talent which you drive player development while spreading it over enough teams to ensure that it still remains quite open and free running.