England will still have a powerful scrum, but the Wallabies are vastly improved from that 2007 effort. Alexander, Moore and Kepu are much better than Dunning, Moore and Sheperdson.I would never dare to write off a UK pack. However, without Sheridan they might lose just enough dominance to be able to scrum us out of the World Cup. The game may be decided on other facets of the game for once.
The Wallabies scrum almost gave up a pushover try against Italy.
England will still have a powerful scrum, but the Wallabies are vastly improved from that 2007 effort. Alexander, Moore and Kepu are much better than Dunning, Moore and Sheperdson.
The All Blacks scrum almost gave up a pushover try against Tonga.
Italy are a very good scrummaging pack.
That scrum was after 2 re-shuffles with a sub then a blood bin, and the Wallabies did not focus enough on it. The Italians did. They should have scored the try.
Apart from that, we won all our feeds, went back twice otherwise, and drove the Italian scrum back nicely on a second shove on their feed.
Overall, pretty good.
The Italians were well on top late in the match, though there were a few subs on for the Wallabies at that point & it may have disrupted the cohesion of the scrum.
A penalty try based on what? The scrum hardly moved. There was an early engagement and the loosies not staying bound.The ABs gave away two scrum penalties and a free kick off the same 5 metre scrum. Whether all those penalties were deserved or not, I would say many referees would have awarded a penalty try by that point.
Kept collapsing? If you're going to comment, at least try to be accurate.Hard to fairly compare a scrum that stayed legal and went backwards to one that kept collapsing so it couldn't be pushed anywhere.
I didn't suggest otherwise.Italy are a very good scrummaging pack.
If anyone is that important, it would be Kepu. Alexander is better than Dunning, but isn't brilliant. Moore is still (rightfully) there. Sharpe and Vickerman were the locks and the backrow was Elsom, Smith and Palu...We're one injury away from looking very 2007ish!
I would say many referees would have awarded a penalty try by that point.
Bollocks they did - the most the Tongans managed was about half a metre on the first scrum, the rest of them went sideways or stayed put. Hardly comparable to the Italian effort, where they'd have gotten the try if the 8 had either controlled the ball a bit longer or picked up a bit earlier.
As an aside - McAlman (I think it was him) who dived on the ball when it scooted out of the scrum had completely disengaged from the scrum. He was in the in-goal, but it's my understanding that while the scrum is still going (which it is until the ball reached the in-goal) defending players are still required to stay bound? Does anyone know if that's right?
Bollocks they did - the most the Tongans managed was about half a metre on the first scrum, the rest of them went sideways or stayed put. Hardly comparable to the Italian effort, where they'd have gotten the try if the 8 had either controlled the ball a bit longer or picked up a bit earlier.
As an aside - McAlman (I think it was him) who dived on the ball when it scooted out of the scrum had completely disengaged from the scrum. He was in the in-goal, but it's my understanding that while the scrum is still going (which it is until the ball reached the in-goal) defending players are still required to stay bound? Does anyone know if that's right?
20.10 ENDING THE SCRUMAs an aside - McAlman (I think it was him) who dived on the ball when it scooted out of the scrum had completely disengaged from the scrum. He was in the in-goal, but it's my understanding that while the scrum is still going (which it is until the ball reached the in-goal) defending players are still required to stay bound? Does anyone know if that's right?