• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

School sporting scholarships/recruitment

Orange Peeler

Peter Burge (5)
Do you really believe that Grammar and High are giving sporting scholarships?

High enrolments are governed by the selective schools exam, there are no fees to speak of and there results on the rugby field suggest that any alleged sporting scholarship programme has not resulted in any success.

Grammar have been going backwards in terms of sport in general and rugby in particular for some time. Again, if they have been running a sporting scholarship programme as suggested, it has been a complete disaster.

Does this mean Joeys as a school is now following an Academic path, due to the lack of 1st XV GPS Rugby tittles over the last few years.
 
T

Tight head Lion

Guest
There's only one person at Joeys who has provided rugby players with scholarships and im sure many of you know who he is, and even he has only handed out 3 and all 3 boys deserved one. If you're willing to fund a boys education because you believe the school is what he needs both academically and rugby wise then good on you and if the school or old boys union aren't involved then i would not count that as 'importing'. PS i don't think your mates donation would have gone towards rugby, probably a bit of a trick to gain funding for the new Arts & Tech building.

I worked at Joeys and have intimate knowledge of what you claim. The boys were given bursarys these are awarded on a number of factors by the foundation and NOT an individual. Even the boss can't fly over their heads. To receive one takes a long list of requirements that ALL must be meet. Having worked there now I know they don't hand out "Booster Support" like three GPS schools do. (Support groups at these schools raise funds to pay for these students. School is not out of pocket) They don't have the money as Joeys don't invite this behavior. Simple.
 
T

Tight head Lion

Guest
Does this mean Joeys as a school is now following an Academic path, due to the lack of 1st XV GPS Rugby tittles over the last few years.

No. They still had 22 undefeated teams (from 45), were unbeaten from 2nd's down to the 9ths and as a whole the school won 81% of all games played.
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
I worked at Joeys and have intimate knowledge of what you claim. The boys were given bursarys these are awarded on a number of factors by the foundation and NOT an individual. Even the boss can't fly over their heads. To receive one takes a long list of requirements that ALL must be meet. Having worked there now I know they don't hand out "Booster Support" like three GPS schools do. (Support groups at these schools raise funds to pay for these students. School is not out of pocket) They don't have the money as Joeys don't invite this behavior. Simple.
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
I worked at Joeys and have intimate knowledge of what you claim. The boys were given bursarys these are awarded on a number of factors by the foundation and NOT an individual. Even the boss can't fly over their heads. To receive one takes a long list of requirements that ALL must be meet. Having worked there now I know they don't hand out "Booster Support" like three GPS schools do. (Support groups at these schools raise funds to pay for these students. School is not out of pocket) They don't have the money as Joeys don't invite this behavior. Simple.

I think there is little difference between what you have described and the so called "Booster Support". They are one of the same in my book you are relying on a technicality to claim the moral high ground.

Joeys have always been very successful in attracting players from other Marist Brothers high schools going back to eighties. They were even successful in converting Protestants to Catholicism back in the eighties. Not saying a technical definition of scholarships were involved just they were successful in attracting players.
 

Elfster

Alex Ross (28)
Tight Head Lion,

Good stats, when your 1st XV is not successful.

These days that is one major concern I have; the success of a rugby program is based only on one team - the 1st XV. At school level rugby should still be a sport, an extra curricula event. The school's program should be about inclusion and getting the best out of what they have, the individual. (Which should be the educational philosophy in general, getting the best out of the individual.)

A good rugby school should be based on what they bring to the whole ethos of education and rugby in general ( Oh hell, I sound like a bit of a Tom Brown Schoolboy's refugee.) If they focus solely on one team they may as well be a league school; one dimensional, appease to the masses over quality and be sponsored and funded by Tom Waterhouse.
 
T

Tight head Lion

Guest
These days that is one major concern I have; the success of a rugby program is based only on one team - the 1st XV. At school level rugby should still be a sport, an extra curricula event. The school's program should be about inclusion and getting the best out of what they have, the individual. (Which should be the educational philosophy in general, getting the best out of the individual.)

A good rugby school should be based on what they bring to the whole ethos of education and rugby in general ( Oh hell, I sound like a bit of a Tom Brown Schoolboy's refugee.) If they focus solely on one team they may as well be a league school; one dimensional, appease to the masses over quality and be sponsored and funded by Tom Waterhouse.

Excellent point.

Sounds very much like Stanmore school. The fact the backline has all league contracts is remarkable. Maybe they "bought" more than just cattle into the school.
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
Excellent point.

Sounds very much like Stanmore school. The fact the backline has all league contracts is remarkable. Maybe they "bought" more than just cattle into the school.

The school at Stanmore not that long ago was on the same slippery slope that has seen High and Grammar exit the GPS competition. They decided to do something about it and lift their standards. Difficult in a school that unlike most in the GPS is more diverse culturally and doesn't draw primarily from a narrow demographic.

The changes have brought success at the top under the principle that a rising tide lifts all boats.

Tight Head Lion you are obviously critical of Newingtons approach, so please do tell how you would have approach the problem Newington faced, or should they have quietly exited the competition after a couple of season of 100 plus floggings?
 

CTPE

Nev Cottrell (35)
Having worked there now I know they don't hand out "Booster Support" like three GPS schools do. (Support groups at these schools raise funds to pay for these students. School is not out of pocket) They don't have the money as Joeys don't invite this behavior. Simple.

Pray tell - who are these "Support groups"?
 

Inside Shoulder

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Difficult in a school that unlike most in the GPS is more diverse culturally and doesn't draw primarily from a narrow demographic.


Their response was to further narrow their demographic to blokes who have signed to play league and reach full physical maturity no later than 16.
Do you have any purpose in mind that might be served by the " rising tide lifts all boats"?
How does winning a rugby premiership actually improve the life opportunities:
(a) for the kids in the team;
(b) for all the other kids at the school;
Short sighted on almost every level.
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
Their response was to further narrow their demographic to blokes who have signed to play league and reach full physical maturity no later than 16.
Do you have any purpose in mind that might be served by the " rising tide lifts all boats"?
How does winning a rugby premiership actually improve the life opportunities:
(a) for the kids in the team;
(b) for all the other kids at the school;
Short sighted on almost every level.

The rising tide comment is that if you have a successful senior team this will rub off on the junior teams, more boys will play and you generate a better rugby program at the school. The old success breeds success argument.

In answer to your points

a) The ultimate decision to send your son to a school is that of the parents they are after all minors. So maybe this question is best answered by the parents. However I imagine like all parents they want the best for their children and don't want to have a conversation in 20 years time about why you as a parent knocked back that opportunity offered to their son as a 16 year old.
b) For the other kids at the school I would say more than 50% probably don't care much for rugby they have other interests which the school would support them in. If the school doesn't support them in these non rugby pursuits to the satisfaction of the parents, they will take their school fee money elsewhere. For the kids that care about rugby they want to see a strong competitive and successful rugby program. Not a rugby program on a slippery slope of 100 point plus floggings and an exit from the GPS competition.

I just struggle to see another way around the problem that they could have implemented in isolation. System wide there are other solutions but that requires the co operation and co ordination of many parties.
 

Inside Shoulder

Nathan Sharpe (72)
I just struggle to see another way around the problem

Whats the problem you're trying to solve?
If it is merely winning then it's solved by importation. At this level winning is entirely secondary to the experience.
If its something else - such as learning to aim up - it isn't going to work.

Boiled down to its basics importation in this way and on this scale just tells everyone who stops to think about the issue that the solution lies in acquisition of more and better talent - from any available source.

The difficulty is that the "GPS competition" is no longer a level playing field: once it ran on the random variations inevitable from year to year. Now it runs on half the teams importing and the other half struggling.
Thats a bullshit competition - it only proves who was prepared to import more and fans debate like this as to when and why any given kid started in 3rd term of year 10 or 11 after coincidentally playing NSW U 16's.

As for the "opportunities" I'd invite you to make some inquiries as to the fate of a number of the imports once they leave school: I'm not going to mention names or outcomes because I do not think that is fair to those young men.
I also think it is unfair to them to use them to make the old boys, or even the parents, feel better by winning a competition that says more about recruitment than the ability of the school to educate, even in rugby.
 

Gristlechewer

Charlie Fox (21)
The school at Stanmore not that long ago was on the same slippery slope that has seen High and Grammar exit the GPS competition. They decided to do something about it and lift their standards. Difficult in a school that unlike most in the GPS is more diverse culturally and doesn't draw primarily from a narrow demographic.

The changes have brought success at the top under the principle that a rising tide lifts all boats.

Tight Head Lion you are obviously critical of Newingtons approach, so please do tell how you would have approach the problem Newington faced, or should they have quietly exited the competition after a couple of season of 100 plus floggings?
Kenny, for the life of me I have not seen a more narrow minded narcissitic view taken. I'm alright Jack, we'll freight in a team, call them our own, grease a few more misguided old boys into paying these kids to stay at school. Yes, read that as a given. This in turn will just get little Johnny or Paul in prep just going and playing another sport as they know that they will just get shuffled into the IV's and maybe be tackling bags at training if they stay playing Rugby.
What a shame for these young lads Kenny for a few to live vicariously through their alma mater.
 

Kenny Powers

Ron Walden (29)
Kenny, for the life of me I have not seen a more narrow minded narcissitic view taken. I'm alright Jack, we'll freight in a team, call them our own, grease a few more misguided old boys into paying these kids to stay at school. Yes, read that as a given. This in turn will just get little Johnny or Paul in prep just going and playing another sport as they know that they will just get shuffled into the IV's and maybe be tackling bags at training if they stay playing Rugby.
What a shame for these young lads Kenny for a few to live vicariously through their alma mater.

And your solution would be?
 
Top