S
sidelineview
Guest
How do you explain Kurtley Beale & Triston Reilly from Joeys pursuing rugby careers post school.
How do you explain Kurtley Beale & Triston Reilly from Joeys pursuing rugby careers post school.
The scholarship argument cant explain the drop off of rugby played in public schools.
Preventing students playing club rugby is because why?
- Saint Ignatius’ College, through the terms of enrolment, will be given priority when a student is
selected to be involved in particular cultural and sporting pursuits, over and above those selected to external sporting and cultural affiliations
Its no excuse though is it? While AFL particularly, and as a new player several years ago, has been diligent in promoting the game through Clubs and become a part of school sport, the rugby powers to be haven't been proactive in looking after the grassroots of the game.
Isnt it normal for all private school rugby players, on scholarship or not, to prioritise school sport?
I agree SLV that private school students do prioritise school sport. And I have no concerns with that when there's actually a clash with compulsory school sport. But, the schools that are often mentioned in this thread expect that prioritisation to occur even when there's no clash regardless of the desires of the player. There are plenty of private school boys running around on Sunday in the club comp here in Sydney but from about U15 those players tend not to be from the schools who get a mention in this thread.
On the public school front, from my experience sports that get a run properly in public schools tend to do so off the back of enthusiastic parents and/or local clubs. Public schools take little responsibility for driving sports other than hit and giggle games with the kids. So, if someone else takes the drivers seat they're more than happy. This is why AFL has been so effective in infiltrating the public school system in non-traditional AFL territories. They turn up with a slick package ("we'll take care of everything") and take all pressure off the schools to do anything or spend anything (and it doesn't hurt that they throw a half decent bribe in for the kids too). There's nothing remotely like it from Rugby.
Well, according to this bloke there’s a simple solution: “With the cost of ACL surgery in Australia estimated to come to $142 million each year, Associate Professor Vertullo is calling for a national prevention program to be established to teach volunteer coaches to introduce effective warm-up techniques.”Club rugby will always struggle as most schools with a good rugby programme are training 4-5 times a week then game day on Saturday throw in a bit off study and it’s far too much to commit to another 2 training sessions a week and a game on Sunday for club rugby.
Then you have preseason school rugby camps and tours along with schoolboy rep training and carnivals along with Harold matts and sg ball players who have been training for 6 months before rugby season starts , club rugby is well down the priority list. I just can’t see how club rugby can survive with these dynamics.
There is far to many injury’s happening in rugby/league , the question has to be asked why?
What you have to consider when you compare AFL and soccer to rugby in respect to club numbers is that for the most part school rugby is the premier rugby competition whereas for soccer and AFL club is the premier competition. Two years ago Shore won the GPS Soccer Competition and for half the games they had their best players unavailable because they were playing for their clubs instead. School AFL competitions also don't tend to be as strong as club competition or development programmes like the Swans Academy. It might be still the case AFL and soccer are out marketing rugby but it's comparing apples to oranges looking at club numbers. Better to look at total registered players.Here is what I think has been happening and I am interested to hear other people's opinions.
1. AFL and Soccer have successfully out marketed Rugby, BIG TIME for all the reasons BAR, sideline and everyone has outlined.
2. Typically boys over 15 find it physically tougher than in younger years, to play a school game on Sat and then back up on Sunday, this is aside from their parents instructing them that study is also now a priority ie on Sunday, as Sat school sport is compulsory.
What you have to consider when you compare AFL and soccer to rugby in respect to club numbers is that for the most part school rugby is the premier rugby competition whereas for soccer and AFL club is the premier competition. Two years ago Shore won the GPS Soccer Competition and for half the games they had their best players unavailable because they were playing for their clubs instead. School AFL competitions also don't tend to be as strong as club competition or development programmes like the Swans Academy. It might be still the case AFL and soccer are out marketing rugby but it's comparing apples to oranges looking at club numbers. Better to look at total registered players.
Rugby is the only sport that pretty much selects for parental income between 12 and 18.
All the other winter codes + cricket do not involve your parents having a lazy $30k after tax to purchase the right to play.
And the number of private schoolboys who make it in cricket (despite a recent uptick) tells you that the $ qualification will not get the best athletes.
That’s how we got here.
It’s not a problem across the ditch.
Well, according to this bloke there’s a simple solution: “With the cost of ACL surgery in Australia estimated to come to $142 million each year, Associate Professor Vertullo is calling for a national prevention program to be established to teach volunteer coaches to introduce effective warm-up techniques.”
https://www.smh.com.au/national/aus...preventable-acl-injuries-20180421-p4zay6.html