Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
yes - everything else seems to have been fully polished
yes - everything else seems to have been fully polished
I would also tend to say location, location, location.......
- A focus on maximising the potential of each boy - academic ability, character, and sporting skills:
- a traditional approach to AAGPS values and practices:
- location:
- quality teaching:
- strong pastoral support.
I could go on but I've got a PR CV to polish.
Damm fine views from the boarding housesI would also tend to say location, location, location...
Why does Shore have such strong demand? What makes it a better option for C of E North Shore parents than Knox or Barker?
There was a very interesting interactive tool on the Australian website a couple of years ago that enabled you to plot and track the 'value add' of the top X schools by examining comparative performance between Yr 7 and Yr 9 NAPLAN results. The premise was simple enough - with a priveleged intake, if all they achieve over 6 years is to spit students out at about the same relative level they were at in Yr 7, then apart from a bit of rugby/rowing/$150-200K parental impoverishment, what has been achieved? Anyway, IIRC, SHORE was the sole GPS/CAS school that added demonstrable improvement over the 2 test periods. Add that to the attributes quoted above and its attractions could be viewed as quite compelling.Why does Shore have such strong demand? What makes it a better option for C of E North Shore parents than Knox or Barker?
Knox is Uniting Church (was Presbyterian) and is at Wahroonga, while Barker is at Hornsby. Location for both ok if one is on upper north shore train line, but a problem for those on the lower north shore, northern beaches and other parts of Sydney. Shore on the other hand is at North Sydney, about 30 seconds walk from the railway station, which is also a transport hub for buses from the lower north shore and northern beaches.
More importantly for some, Shore is a GPS school, whereas the other 2 aren't. It also seems to me that Shore has maintained a fairly traditional outlook on education and isn't given to the latest educational gimics, and in keeping with this thread, Shore recognises that sport is there to complement the academic process, not to overwhelm it.
Sure you need the sarcasm emoticon"other parts of Sydney?" I don't know of any Shore Old Boy not from the North Shore.
There was a very interesting interactive tool on the Australian website a couple of years ago that enabled you to plot and track the 'value add' of the top X schools by examining comparative performance between Yr 7 and Yr 9 NAPLAN results. The premise was simple enough - with a priveleged intake, if all they achieve over 6 years is to spit students out at about the same relative level they were at in Yr 7, then apart from a bit of rugby/rowing/$150-200K parental impoverishment, what has been achieved? Anyway, IIRC, SHORE was the sole GPS/CAS school that added demonstrable improvement over the 2 test periods. Add that to the attributes quoted above and its attractions could be viewed as quite compelling.
Meanwhile in the Eastern Suburbs
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...dent-performance/story-fnpn118l-1227408655762
It's probably an economic decision.
It's probably an economic decision.
In that case, maybe they could sell the altitude chamber, sack the sports scientist and the numerous other directors and professional coaches and just let the teachers coach the teams?