• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Salvi coming home?

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jeffrey Calder

Guest
In deference to those on the George Smith thread who wanted to keep that thread clear of speculation on the future I thought I'd post this in a new thread.

Today's Canberra Times reports that Brumbies boss Andrew Fagan made Julian Salvi an informal offer to come back in 2011 yesterday after having had a meeting with him to discuss this possibility earlier in the week. Something I suspect most Brumbies fans are hoping for.

However, it did also say that he'd met with the Rebels on Tuesday. So looking at coming home, but will it be Canberra?
 

disco

Chilla Wilson (44)
Salvi will come home wether he plays for the rebels or Brumbies is up to Pocock, the Rebels made it clear they want Mortlock, Elsom, Barnes, Pocock, Robinson, Palu & Vickerman all in vic next year.

Salvi won't go sit on the bench anywhere he's good enough to demand a starting spot in 1 of the 5 super 15 sides next year & I'd gladly have him at the Reds next year if we don't get Pocock.
 

Brumby Jack

Steve Williams (59)
With regards to Salvi meeting with the Brumbies, Andrew Fagan was unable to tell Salvi what was revealed by George Smith on Friday.
Salvi has an option for another year in his current contract with Bath but he has pretty much come and out and said he would only return if it was to a starting position after being behind Smith for so long.

Obviously there was talk of the Brumbies getting Pocock next season and that's to be expected, but I personally can't see it happening and with having Salvi back, there is less settling in time since he knows the systems that are in place with the team.
 

Biffo

Ken Catchpole (46)
disco said:
the Rebels made it clear they want Mortlock, Elsom, Barnes, Pocock, Robinson, Palu & Vickerman all in vic next year.

Evidence?

Oh dear, I'm in trouble with Scarfie again :'(. He doesn't like clarification and agreement of facts as the foundation of rational analysis and discussion ::)
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Back to the point: Salvi? Not tough enough for 7. Not big enough for 8. Not enough of a prick to be a 6. Fair player at any of these positions, but I'm not seeing what you're all raving about.
 
S

Spook

Guest
NTA said:
Back to the point: Salvi? Not tough enough for 7. Not big enough for 8. Not enough of a prick to be a 6. Fair player at any of these positions, but I'm not seeing what you're all raving about.

Oh dear.
 

Biffo

Ken Catchpole (46)
I suspect Hodgson would be most likely to step up to back-up for Pocock/ Palu for the Wallabies.
 
S

Second row

Guest
NTA, I disagree. Salvi has plenty of mongrel for either 6 or 7. Hopefully he can now shine as he won't be in the shadow of George Smith.
 
S

Spook

Guest
Biffo said:
I suspect Hodgson would be most likely to step up to back-up for Pocock/ Palu for the Wallabies.

I agree. Robbie will go for a versatile backup.
 

naza

Alan Cameron (40)
NTA said:
Back to the point: Salvi? Not tough enough for 7. Not big enough for 8. Not enough of a prick to be a 6. Fair player at any of these positions, but I'm not seeing what you're all raving about.

He's not even worthy of having his own thread !
 

Lee Grant

John Eales (66)
Maybe he will shine when he's not treated as a general backrow dogsbody.

The best rugby I have seen from him, and probably because he's playing in one position - is as 1st choice fetcher for Bath this season. Playing in tandem with the excellent 8. Luke Watson has done him no harm either.

Bath will be sorry to see him go, if he does. He's giving up few too many penalties but otherwise has been great value as Bath like a quick game that our fetchers are good at. He's earning his pay packet on defence also - at one time the commentators said he was leading the tackle count in the GP.
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
I think he is pretty handy. Melbourne wouldn't be doing half-bad if they signed him.

He is cut from the same mold as Hodgson. Pigeon-holed as a 7 due to size. Obviously, this changed over time though with Hodgson playing 6 now.

Anyway, who knows what will happen to him.
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Spook said:
NTA said:
Back to the point: Salvi? Not tough enough for 7. Not big enough for 8. Not enough of a prick to be a 6. Fair player at any of these positions, but I'm not seeing what you're all raving about.

Oh dear.

Don't be too upset - your cunning smokescreen couldn't last long :)
 
S

Spook

Guest
NTA said:
Spook said:
NTA said:
Back to the point: Salvi? Not tough enough for 7. Not big enough for 8. Not enough of a prick to be a 6. Fair player at any of these positions, but I'm not seeing what you're all raving about.

Oh dear.

Don't be too upset - your cunning smokescreen couldn't last long :)

Oh dear.
 
W

weetam

Guest
No, no you do not want Salvi back with Brumbies or the Force. He is just not up to it. Much better for him to stay at Bath and ply his trade as being the best 7 in the Guiness Premiership.
Besides that heard that the new Mrs Salvi is absolutely taken with our lovely Georgian city and so Julian you know you have to keep the misses happy!!!!
 
T

tranquility

Guest
he is a must for either Melbourne or any of the other franchises. Has done his apprenticeship.
 
S

Spook

Guest
weetam said:
No, no you do not want Salvi back with Brumbies or the Force. He is just not up to it. Much better for him to stay at Bath and ply his trade as being the best 7 in the Guiness Premiership.
Besides that heard that the new Mrs Salvi is absolutely taken with our lovely Georgian city and so Julian you know you have to keep the misses happy!!!!

A spy from Bath. Ready the spike.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top