WorkingClassRugger
Michael Lynagh (62)
I'm a bit surprised by the prevailing attitude to drugs expressed above, since normally I find this forum to be quite liberal. I'm not sure there's any evidence that a drug like cocaine or marijuana is anywhere near as bad for users or their community as a drug like alcohol or tobacco.
There's a strong moral argument against using drugs because you're knowingly supporting the business model of actual criminals (and ultimately the exploitation and murder of Colombian coca leaf farmers, for instance), but that's born of the illegality of drugs rather than drugs themselves.
And re: the "he signed a contract" idea, there are plenty of occasions in which I think employers use the negotiating imbalance inherent to employment contracts to require unfair conditions. It's obviously a legal defence of the club's actions, but I don't think it makes them fair.
Anyway, that's my $0.02. I think he was pretty hard-done by.
The history of DV, on the other hand, makes me absolutely not want him in rugby.
I'm actually all for the legalization of otherwise commonly thought of as recreational drugs like Marijuana and even a number of party drugs as a means of regulating, controlling the quality and composition of these substances. I see a regulated industry that is accountable for their product as a preferable situation to the current system where many of these substance are made in suburban makeshift labs and cut with god knows what.
There's also the opportunity to generate taxation revenue that then could be used in education and/or prevention programs in regards to drugs as a whole but also in particular the more anti-social substances such as Ice etc.
My objection to Barba is more a history of indiscretion and misconduct.