But he hasn't been the best seven in the RC.
I thought I'd try to quantify everyone's opinions on who played better in the rugby championship by looking at the stats, rather than each nation shouting "our 7 played better". Here are the results:
McCaw: 6 games, 79 tackles, 43 runs (229m), 42 rucks/mauls, 8 penalties, 5 miss tackles, 8 turnovers
Hooper: 5 games, 69 tackles, 38 runs (224m), 40 rucks/mauls, 5 penalties, 12 miss tackles, 6 turnovers
So all in all they are reasonably close together, Hooper missed more tackles but cost less in terms of penalties. That said, I took these stats from rugbystats.com.au and I'm guessing they're totally fucked anyway, especially given that according to the website Hooper only ran 21m against the argies on saturday (they must have attributed his 70m run off the lineout intercept to someone else).
Moral of the story? Fuck stats!
Conclusion? Hooper is better because he's Australian. McCaw is worse because he's not Australian.
Also for the kiwi reader:
Conclusion? McCaw us bittir bicaus hi's kiwi. Jandals suxpeck in me chullybin kiora how gud is Scribe bro! shut!