Scrubber2050
Mark Ella (57)
Guys - all good and valid points
I reluctantly concede to superior argument
I reluctantly concede to superior argument
I wouldn'tIf Bernard Foley made himself available 2 weeks from Rio I'd pick him.
So Quade is officially not going to Rio. A shame, as I think he showed a lot of potential in his two outings.
I think most of us thought he would be terrific at sevens.
Obviously the Coach believes differently.
I think everyone acknowledges that Scrubber, even the coach. Just that without him playing multiple tournaments and training with the team, he is too much of a risk to take to the Olympics.
.
Fair enough but then, why pick him at all if he was doomed from the start.
Because there was interest from both sides and it was worth investigating because of the skill set he offers.
Some players have taken to 7s much faster than others.
There was every chance it would have worked.
Don't know about "every chance"
The reality is that it did not !!!!
Seems like a distraction in retropect
We've used about 25 players to make up our 12 man squad this season.
There's a lot of experimentation going on to try and work out our best combinations.
There are a couple of players who won't be far from making the final 12 for the Olympics with only two or three tournaments played particularly depending on how a couple of players recover from injury. That said, if your only criteria in selecting players this season was whether they were very likely to make our Olympics team, you wouldn't have picked about 8-10 players.
We've also wanted to manage the workloads of our key players so having more players available has been important.