ANY Wallabies player looking to play Sevens at the Rio Olympic Games next year will not be able to play Super Rugby in 2016, ARU boss Bill Pulver has indicated.
Backing up the statements of Australia’s Sevens coach Geraint John — who wants players to commit to his squad no later than January 1 — Pulver said it will not be realistic for players to jump in and out of Sevens and XVs rugby in 2016.
That means any player who switches to Sevens for an Olympics tilt would no longer be paid by their Super franchise, but by the ARU’s Sevens program.
“The whole issue of Wallabies playing for Australia at the Olympics, if there are individual players that want to play, each one is going to be a unique discussion and unique negotiation,” Pulver said.
“However, there are some things to consider. The Super Rugby season probably finishes with the grand final on August 2nd, the Olympic Games start [on August 5], so if you play Super Rugby you simply could not jump out of the Super Rugby season and go straight into the Sevens program, you couldn’t do it.
“If I’m a Super Rugby club, I’m not going to take a player who can’t play for me in the final, so practically if a Wallaby is going to choose to make himself available for the Olympics he’s going to have to make the decision right at the front end of the season.
“The reality is early decisions will have to be made … you will have to commit very early.
“A Super Rugby team is not going to have you if you can’t play the final, and the Sevens coach won’t allow you to walk in two weeks before the event.
“I don’t think there will be many players involved, if there are any it will be a very short list.
“At the most I think there might be a few players involved.
"We’d have to find a resolution for them, because if Australian rugby was taking them into the Sevens event, I wouldn’t be expecting the Super Rugby club to keep paying for them.”
Meanwhile, Pulver has revealed that southern hemisphere unions have again lobbied their northern counterparts to play inbound Tests after the Super Rugby season, rather than during a break late in the tournament.\
“One of the things we’re working on is the international match calendar, and from a southern hemisphere perspective we are frustrated that the June inbound series force this big break in Super Rugby,” Pulver said.
“We’d love to change that.
“In an ideal world you’d have a Super Rugby season that starts in February and ends at the end of June, and then you’d roll into your internationals.
“And that would be a much better structure for all of the southern hemisphere.
“That’s an item on the agenda, changing the international match calendar is bloody hard.
“We’ve put a couple of options to them that we think could work, some that are exciting, I don’t want to talk about them just yet.
“But we’ve thrown a couple of options at them that we think are really worth looking at.
“The problem with the June inbounds is that by that stage there are two or three teams already out of the comp, so we get to that break, and them come back for two or three games, their fans are gone.
“So it’s a brutal impact on their season. You’d rather play a continuous Super Rugby season, and then your internationals, and there’s some really interesting concepts in how you could structure the international series.
“You could argue the June series is fun, but how meaningful is it?
“If you’re thinking about those series as an asset in world rugby you could probably do more, do better with a better plan.”
The idea has been floated previously by southern unions but rejected because playing in-bounds in late June or July would disrupt the lucrative northern club competitions like Top 14 in France and Aviva Premiership in England.