Called itNot sure they could've stopped the try, but letting him in field for an easier conversion might be telling in this game
Exactly too shit a start, in a short season that is the type of game that we just have to win.. well that sucks. That was a very winnable game. They looked somewhat gassed. I feel that they played a lot for not enough reward in that first half. Chasing those early 10pts was the undoing.
Also don’t underestimate the energy expended last Saturday night v Cru and then a 6 day turnaround... well that sucks. That was a very winnable game. They looked somewhat gassed. I feel that they played a lot for not enough reward in that first half. Chasing those early 10pts was the undoing.
Interesting. I saw it differently. I thought Hanigan was excellent. Gamble & Gleeson not so much excellent but I thought they got through a lot of work. Won’t be surprised if Gambles tackle count is way up there as he seemed to be getting around a lot. Gleeson probably another step down but I noticed he was first cleaner a lot.tahs backrow well below where they needed to be, struggled to compete where it was available and gave away too many penalties when it wasn't. Didn't bring much on the carry either. Complete 180 from last week where they were largely excellent, particularly as a unit.
... I don't. Which is why you need to be smart as a team how you approach a game. It's something that has undone a lot of AU teams over the years, going hard for a half and looking good, only to taper off and get blown away in the second half.Also don’t underestimate the energy expended last Saturday night v Cru and then a 6 day turnaround.
English cricket team vibes.View attachment 18372
Tahs socials don't care what the ref says
Gamble let a lot of opportunities to get on the ball go begging, Murphy was paying good contest and the highlanders got good pay where Gamble couldn't mostly because he folded over without really attacking the ball. Hanigan was a bit the same but would then give away the penalty by latching afterwards. He did get one good steal but more generally his (and Gleeson's) error rate was too high. Vailanu was much better at the ruck than any of the backrow. Additionally, if you can't secure your own ball it probably means your back row is doing something wrong.Interesting. I saw it differently. I thought Hanigan was excellent. Gamble & Gleeson not so much excellent but I thought they got through a lot of work. Won’t be surprised if Gambles tackle count is way up there as he seemed to be getting around a lot. Gleeson probably another step down but I noticed he was first cleaner a lot.
As a team though they did turn a bit of ball over, maybe they have something to answer for there.
Those 10 points in the first 10 minutes. We lost the game there.. well that sucks. That was a very winnable game. They looked somewhat gassed. I feel that they played a lot for not enough reward in that first half. Chasing those early 10pts was the undoing.