TSR
Andrew Slack (58)
Win to the Maroons by default then?Why do the hurricanes even exist? Shouldn't they be the cyclones?
Win to the Maroons by default then?Why do the hurricanes even exist? Shouldn't they be the cyclones?
Hopefully we can downgrade them to a tropical low on SundayWhy do the hurricanes even exist? Shouldn't they be the cyclones?
Or maybe a tempest, just above a full fartHopefully we can downgrade them to a tropical low on Sunday
I will point out that I said 'wallaby talks' - not starters but let's give it a go (note that its off wiki, so potentially not up to date)Do Reds have more starters at test level the Hurricanes? bases on last years RWC is Reds have 3 starting wallabies in Tate, Petaia and Mcreight.
Nongorr was there in the 23 through AAA injury, and Vunivalu & Faesller was on the periphery of matchday selections.
Yeah bit hard to track or quantify ‘all blacks talks’ though if we’re making a comparison between those two?I will point out that I said 'wallaby talks' - not starters but let's give it a go (note that its off wiki, so potentially not up to date)
This is just the starting 15s fyi
BACKS
Test Players: Hurricanes 3 v Reds 5
Test Caps: Hurricanes 1,2,51 = 54 v Reds 1,4,21,29, 31 = 86
FORWARDS
Test Players: Hurricanes 2 v Reds 7
Test Caps: Hurricanes 6,32 = 38 v Reds 4, 4, 5, 5, 12, 17, 37 =84
Yeh 100% - forwards get closer when you take out ravai and hodgman (didnt included JTA), but that still reinforces the gulf - bringing in test caps foreigners and still struggling to beat newly promoted NPC players.Yeah bit hard to track or quantify ‘all blacks talks’ though if we’re making a comparison between those two?
Are you counting Ravai, Hodgman and Toomaga-Allen in these test figures?
I know I didn’t specify ‘Australia test players’, but I thought the theme of your comments was Wallabies in Reds vs All Blacks in Hurricanes and the gulf between them? in which case, total Wallaby caps in Reds are pretty similar to All Blacks caps in Hurricanes.
A first pass of experience per player in each of the match day 23's:
View attachment 18316
All caps taken from https://all.rugby/ I find they're a pretty good source though they lack Japan league one and only go back to about 2013. Super caps I've listed should be one less than what all.rugby shows, that's because they include this weekend's team list. Only exception is Jordie Barret who they have listed at 99 even though this is definitely his 100th. I've included Peni Ravai's top 14 games as Super Rugby caps, no other players had top flight club caps listed in a competition other than super. Other Caps are any nation other than where the team is based (All Blacks for the Canes, Wallabies for the Reds) and Barbarians caps, which there were a handful of. Biggest gap otherwise is probably in the 2nd XV caps - I'm pretty sure there were some Australia A caps missing (those against Japan probably) and there were no Maori All blacks caps which would likely shift the data significantly. Highlighting scale is based on the combined range for each column.
Overall it looks like the Reds have the edge of experience at super and test level, but it's not a huge difference. Ravai's Fiji caps definitely shift the combined total in the Reds favour though, not too surprising given he's the 2nd most capped player across the 23's. I didn't break the super caps up base on the team played for but from a cohesion perspective my feel looking through them was the majority of both teams played their super games for their current team, but with Hodgman and Ravai bringing in around 150 caps from elsewhere the Cane's probably have the edge there.
The clearest difference in experience is those professional games played at NPC level with the Canes blowing the Reds out of the water there. Only 3 players with less than 10 games NPC in the 23 and 2 of those are the most experienced All Blacks in the squad - Lomax and Barrett. I didn't have NRC data, but it wouldn't move the needle very far - Tate has about 20 caps, Wilson and McReight are similar but most of the current Reds will be in the 0-5 range. This isn't new information but seeing that extra 500+ professional games for an otherwise slightly less experienced 23 is stark. We really fucking need that 3rd tier going, otherwise we may as well just say fuck it and start flooding the NRC with our young fringe talent in the off season.
I had planned on doing a more complete version of this for the Australian squads (at least) before the season started but I didn't get the chance.
And the data in a table if anyone wants to play around with it, unfortunately the copy paste doesn't come with my nice formatting:
Ironically the one exception to that in the Hurricanes squad is Tyrell Lomax, and he came through the Australian systemNPC is the big one! Takes ALOT more to become a NZ Super player - not many teenagers in their squads!
Be pretty easy for them to crunch the historic numbers of average kickable penalties & kick conversion rates vs. conversion of attacking opportunities (5m lineouts etc) against NZ teams to have a fair idea of the risk reward of the various approaches... plus a raft of other insights based on points differentials, time within a match etc..etc.It may be as simple as taking the 3s at penalty time? Should we be doing that v the kiwis or just back our lineout and maul more?
Agree. I think the Reds have every opportunity to get one over the Canes at this oddly neutral location, even if the bookies disagree.Oh, as an addendum to the above it's probably also worth noting that the Hurricanes have a huge amount of experience on the sideline:
- Kirifi (66 super 1 ABs XV)
- Flanders (41 Super)
- Shields (74 Super, 81 English Prem, 14 Top 14, 8 English tests)
- Perenara (122 super, 83 All Blacks).
Perenara alone could close the gap in test matches and half the difference in super. Him and Shields would be 1 and 2 for top flight club caps if they were fit and included.
Given the weight of back row talent missing and our strength there we really should be taking the game to them. Early days under a new coach buys a bit of lee way, but I don't know we could've asked for a better opportunity to get over the Cane's.
Bets placed always have an impact on the bookies price and the narrative of Australian vs New Zealand teams recently is likely going to see money laid on the kiwi sides tilting the odds a bit more in favour of the kiwi sides.Agree. I think the Reds have every opportunity to get one over the Canes at this oddly neutral location, even if the bookies disagree.