Interesting discussion on refs, and one that a couple of lines won't do justice to. However, I view it completely differently, and again most won't agree with me, as they see the laws as black and white, which they may or may not be. However, my instructions have always been, figure out how the ref is reffing, or what interpretations he is reffing to and play to that. The ref is part of the game. If you think about the breakdown, count the decisions the ref has to make, and the time he has to make them, quite a few, very quickly. force the timeframe on those decisions, ie, do things quickly, and make him work. As he fatigues, as players do, that decision process will become more difficult and flawed. Use the ref as an advantage. Even in this day of largely programmed athletes, I don't see this happening as much as it should. Scrums is one area I can't quite figure out why things aren't changed as the ref makes it clear what he is policing. Very few refs know too much about the scrum, and there are plenty of advantages to be taken at scrum time. Remember, the referee is the sole judge of fact and law, and the referee shall apply all laws fairly, those two laws carry a fair bit of weight, from there it is up to his review group to decide how accurately he applied the laws. There is plenty to write on this subject, but I don't see it as cheating, just extending the referee through accelerating his decision making process and playing at the edge of his interpretations. I am sure most don't see it that way.