T
TOCC
Guest
You can run through every game and finds hundreds of things a ref missed from either side
If that's true then there's serious bloody issues with the game
You can run through every game and finds hundreds of things a ref missed from either side
If that's true then there's serious bloody issues with the game
Nah, there will be always something being missed or ignored to keep a game flowing. Every scrum can be an issue
There were 3 Wallabies locks on the pitch last night, yet a 20yr old with 4 Super Rugby caps played better then all of them
I like to think Rodda would have been hot on Tuis heels had he started also. Fantastic to see the young locks of Australia putting real pressure upwards. Coleman and Arnold did it fantastically last year, and Rodda, Tui, Rhp and even Richie Arnold are doing it again. Think we are well placed in that department for 2019 and 2023.
If like you say, there's hundreds of things been missed or open to interpretation then there's an issue, and it only seeks to reinforce the opinion that refs are susceptible to premeditated bias or home crowd persuasion, neither of which are in the spirit of the game
It's the best crop of locks Australia has had coming through in over a decade IMO
I don't see how your first statement reinforces the second at all.
If that's true then there's serious bloody issues with the game
Most people don't have the time or inclination to painstakingly watch a whole game freeze-frame by freeze-frame and code it all objectively. From experience, it takes ages. And ultimately, people will still pick selective pieces that piss them off the most and keep throwing them at you. Can be thankless.
I posted it last night here and on Twitter, and watching again has not changed my mind - I thought the Reds played more of the "better" attacking footy, and their defence was more aggressive and forced the higher number of Waratah errors. But it was lost with the loose, and mainly avoidable penalties in the latter stages, from which the Waratahs took full toll, points-wise. Really was a game that could have gone either way, and I couldn't say one served it more than the other.
Scrums have changed too much to have straight feeds. There is so much pressure now that if the ball goes in straight it is a 50/50. The idea is the scrum feed is supposed to advantage the team that has it. Its why World Rugby quietly abandoned the straight feed directive after a few months last year. It wasn't working.I have tried to convert a couple of my neighbours. One in particular, he is a former professional league player.
Apart from the obvious complexities of the game, the other gripes he had were that the ball is not put straight into the scrum (and it is not, even though we have bagged the leaguies for years about their "scrums"), and it is not thrown straight into the lineouts.
WR (World Rugby) do the stats on World Cups.I'd love to see the figures for time of ball in play and compare it to 10 years or 15 years ago
Scrums have changed too much to have straight feeds. There is so much pressure now that if the ball goes in straight it is a 50/50. The idea is the scrum feed is supposed to advantage the team that has it. Its why World Rugby quietly abandoned the straight feed directive after a few months last year. It wasn't working.
WR (World Rugby) do the stats on World Cups.
Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk