Hugh Jarse
Rocky Elsom (76)
^^^ Not many would disagree with your points 1 and 3 but most think QC (Quade Cooper) had pleasing flashes.
I never maketipos typeographic speling misteaks typos either.
I never make
Who is Marto?
Greg Martin. Former Australian test fullback. Commentator with Fox Sports. Fanatical Reds supporter. Colour commentator who says the daftest things in commentary. Significantly worse than Murray Mexted.
Greg Martin. Former Australian test fullback. Commentator with Fox Sports. Fanatical Reds supporter. Colour commentator who says the daftest things in commentary. Significantly worse than Murray Mexted.
But a good commentator in that he does know his game and adds a bit of humor as well. he certainly hammers a poor referee's decision, but will say why.
Probably because he's an advocate for the Reds, he gets put down by all those Gaggers who support the other tribes.
But a good commentator in that he does know his game and adds a bit of humor as well. he certainly hammers a poor referee's decision, but will say why.
Probably because he's an advocate for the Reds, he gets put down by all those Gaggers who support the other tribes.
All the "colour" guys - Martin, Kearns and Cannon have been awful of late, not least of all getting names repeatedly wrong, but their general lack of knowledge of laws at times is terrible, and especially embarrassing when they proceed to bang on at length about some unjust penalty that was completely appropriate.
At times, all have some humour, but Martin and Kearns need to park their obvious bias at the door a bit, as it gets in the way of decent commentary.
Reds get a big break with Kade Poki out
I put Cannon above the other two, if asked a question about a game of rugby, he at least attempts to answer the question and then attempts to be funny, Kearns and Marto forget the question and attempt to be funny.All the "colour" guys - Martin, Kearns and Cannon have been awful of late, not least of all getting names repeatedly wrong, but their general lack of knowledge of laws at times is terrible, and especially embarrassing when they proceed to bang on at length about some unjust penalty that was completely appropriate.
At times, all have some humour, but Martin and Kearns need to park their obvious bias at the door a bit, as it gets in the way of decent commentary.