fatprop said:
The Reds simply weren't good enough, they thought they had the game won at 70 minutes against 14 men.
Sub-consciously maybe so. That kind of thing happens a lot with them. I'll back Link to turn them around though.
waratahjesus said:
could easily be said that the win was due to the waratahs doing enough during the last 6-7 minutes though.
Correct - when a team in any sport thinks they are unlucky there is usually another side to the story. The main thing the Tahs can take out of the game apart from the dominant scrum is that 10 minutes of excellence overcame 70 minutes of playing by numbers lethargy. But if they think that kind of thing will work against a mentally tough team with a good bench, they have another thing coming.
On the other hand the Reds will be appalled that 70 minutes of dash and excellence was ruined by 10 minutes when they lost their nerve.
They needed more leadership in that time, especially in the forwards. I expect that Reds folks may roll in laughter when they read this but: if they had Waugh for the last 10 minutes of the game and the Tahs had Horwill, they would have won.
Suggested responses should include the usual type of thing such as:
- yes I did laugh
- so long as we don't have to use him in other games
- don't be condescending