Before the first game of the season, Links said if the Reds won three of their first six games, that that result would be acceptable to him.
By that I assume he also meant that from after six games the Reds would gel as a combination and move on.
However that combination of the team is not taking shape yet, although did for the 30 minutes against the Sharks.
At this point, the Reds have been seriously hurt, their pride is now on the line, and I for one can see a change of attitude taking place against the Brumbies.
As for Murphy.
If he was playing according to the coach's instructions, i.e. a ball distributor & not a play maker, then keep him on, but have him change to the later.
If he ignored the coach, then replace him with Sam lane.
One last point regarding what I see as a failure in MacKenzie as coach. He should have changed from Harris to Lucas earlier in the season, as Lucas when he finally did play at 10 brought another element into the game for the Reds. Why didn't Links put Lucas into that position in earlier games, even if for 20 - 30 minutes to compare, and move Harris out as he did in the Sharks game. Seems like poor coaching to me.
OMG, I've committed the cardinal sin & accused Links of poor coaching tactics!