suckerforred
Chilla Wilson (44)
I find this whole discussion interesting. Over the past 3 or so years the Reds have slowly been extracting what 'shared' services that they were using at the ARU.
Last year, from about July or August, the Reds took over their own Membership administration & management. A function that was previously managed centrally by the ARU for all/most clubs. If they have done this what is going to make them return to a 'centralised' model?
I can see the logic behind the proposal but I am not sure that sufficient levels of independance will be able to be maintained. Has this been one of the problems for the ARU? They have tried to keep hold of a power base that the individual unions are now deciding that they can make work better & more efficiently.
Last year, from about July or August, the Reds took over their own Membership administration & management. A function that was previously managed centrally by the ARU for all/most clubs. If they have done this what is going to make them return to a 'centralised' model?
I can see the logic behind the proposal but I am not sure that sufficient levels of independance will be able to be maintained. Has this been one of the problems for the ARU? They have tried to keep hold of a power base that the individual unions are now deciding that they can make work better & more efficiently.