Quade off to the Rebels? .
If that’s true it’s a good move. Foleys finally on the outer. Beale may not be the answer.
The rebs are on the up. RWC is next year.
The balls in Quades court.
I’d be spending the entire off season in tackling drills and watching vids of Barrett - hellbent on making Thorne and Cheiks look like gooses.
But he’s just as likely to be shooting hoops and sunning himself.
Therein lies the enigma.
Personally I think I have more chances of winning lotto than Quade being Wallaby number 10 again....and no I am not anti Quade but just not seen anything showing he can offer the sort of consistency of performance required at test level...defensively a worry and on attack just does not still seem to know when to do the flair pass vs just pass the frigging ball to a player in space.If that’s true it’s a good move. Foleys finally on the outer. Beale may not be the answer.
The rebs are on the up. RWC is next year.
The balls in Quades court.
I’d be spending the entire off season in tackling drills and watching vids of Barrett - hellbent on making Thorne and Cheiks look like gooses.
But he’s just as likely to be shooting hoops and sunning himself.
Therein lies the enigma.
NIce welcome to country by the new director at Suncorp tonight
Is this what the bloke brings to the Reds? What does he offer us?
You should Google him. While you're at it Google the other appointment too.Yes it was.
Is this what the bloke brings to the Reds? What does he offer us?
You know, in the actual role.
You should Google him. While you're at it Google the other appointment too.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Yes it was.
Is this what the bloke brings to the Reds? What does he offer us?
You know, in the actual role.
I suppose that depends if you think the QRU's issues are rugby related or governance/finance/engagement/inclusiveness related?i want to ask the same question. Im a bit ignorant, what makes a good board member? Neither of these people really seem to have a huge amount of rugby background, is that totally irrelevant? In my mind you want people in those roles who really know their rugby and have skills that contribute to the overall organisation but am i just totally skewered in my thinking?
I suppose that depends if you think the QRU's issues are rugby related or governance/finance/engagement/inclusiveness related?
You have to take these appointments in the context of the other board members thoughWith two new board members coming from what you might term "inclusiveness" it seems an odd skew in an organisation
You have to take these appointments in the context of the other board members though
Chairman is ex-Reds and works for a bank
Deputy chair is ex-club player, and a senior finance executive
Connors and Sharpe are ex-players who work in securities and recruitment and have some kind of media presence
Stanton is a CA and CFO/CEO and long term rugby exec
Curran is there for his country rugby experience
The new appointments make sense as part of that board - bringing their own different POV
You have to take these appointments in the context of the other board members though
Chairman is ex-Reds and works for a bank
Deputy chair is ex-club player, and a senior finance executive
Connors and Sharpe are ex-players who work in securities and recruitment and have some kind of media presence
Stanton is a CA and CFO/CEO and long term rugby exec
Curran is there for his country rugby experience
The new appointments make sense as part of that board - bringing their own different POV