If it is Lance, in the circumstances its a fabulous addition. Does Quade go the other way?
Is that the same player that's heading back to England?
Do they really make any money out of Trial matches? I also think there is little to be gained from running them at all.
My understanding is rural councils often throw a bit of cash their way when they're ran.
The problem with understated lead in, is it can create a lack of interest by media and in turn customers. "Flying under the radar" don't pay the bills.Yeah, I guess. But you still have to cart everything and everyone there. In the last few years, Queensland has had one trial at home and one away. Which disrupts preparation for the big show. I like the understated way things are happening up here and the search for players that aren't bigger than the team.
The problem with understated lead in, is it can create a lack of interest by media and in turn customers. "Flying under the radar" don't pay the bills.
Given the turnover in player and coaching ranks, I think a trial match against a high quality opposition would benefit them. Under Links reign he made a point of playing the Crusaders in trial matches, why, because he said the Crusaders were the best and to be the best he wanted his team playing the best.
Actually many sporting organizations make money from having their team play in front of people prepared to buy tickets to watch them play. This is after all a pro team. With only eight home games I would think any chance to create support and generate revenue is worthy of a professional franchise to target. That said only worth doing commercially if there is a profit. It’s always a tough call risking injury to players before season starts proper but injury just as likely on training paddock. I hope we win every game but if after a first game loss I hear “ first game and building combinations” a “bit rusty’ or we learnt a lot from our first game I will be very pissed.Your right, winning does. No one made a living out of winning trial matches.