Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
While I'm one of the suckers who keep paying year in year out and going to every game, I think any Reds fan have every right to walk away from the team.
It probably suggests intelligence rather than fickleness in support.
Remember when we pined to get rid of Carmichael, McCall and Graham? No one could have predicted you could find 3 less competent people in each role, but they did. Probably the biggest accomplishment in the last 4 years.
The losing isn't the problem for most (although Reds fans have always supported winner more, they will fill Suncorp winning 6-3 every week vs losing 45-43), the problem is that the organisation doesn't even try.
The Reds are at the point where the only thing that excites the crowd is the occasional try and the opportunity to pile on Frisby every time he box kicks.
I highly doubt Stiles will get the chop. Maybe he will re-discover his "passion"
for QLD and resign, but the presence of Stiles or any of these assistants next year means no finals football in 2018.
It's hard as a rugby fan, with everything else competing for your dollars, it's hard to say "sure, I'll buy memberships for my family" knowing full well that you'll be watching your beloved team lose each week in an empty stadium.
Paying $70 a match to watch the slop we are forced to endure is a big ask for anyone.
Fans are not owed results. That's part of sports. They are however, owed hope. You lay down your money and get the chance to see your team play and hopefully win, not get pumped by that Force team.
Add in a stagnant economy for most workers (largely -ive wages growth when compared to CPI and for a large proportion of the market disposable income is falling. Obviously this means luxury items come under pressure and when that luxury item has been a source of more angst than pleasure the decision is made simple.
As Redshappy said after the dour years of Link/Hickey/Foley (even though under link they won a lot and made plenty of finals, which shows that simply winning is not enough IMO) crowds declined and even a winning title run playing some scintillating rugby did not bring the crowds back. The habit and engagement has been broken and the fans aren't so much fickle as choosey.
As I said into this equation of very poor results, perceived lack of accountability, incompetence and in some cases allegations of corruption and mismanagement comes the stern fact of a declining middle class with less disposable income. To compete they not only have to improve consistent quality, but they will have to broaden the reach and penetration of their product (which like it or not requires breaking the Subscription TV only model). I used to think FTA was the only way, but more and more I think live streaming and perhaps even streaming of past games is the way to go.
Certainly what they need to do is engage with people who are already Rugby supporters and re-engage them with the professional product because there are a very large number who have zero engagement even though they are involved in the sport. Harvest the low hanging fruit to give sustainability and sticky customers then turn the attention to the growth markets.
As far as I am concerned Australian Super Rugby is dead, the corpse is on life support and getting wheeled around like "Bernie" in that 90s movie with about as much future.