Thanks RH. Your URL got me past the pay wall. Very interesting.
Smith has come across as something of a QRU/Reds management lackey for some time. Very interesting that he is choosing this position. Either he genuinely supports the Reds and is as irritated as we are, so stuff maintaining his contacts. OR he is using the same contacts and someone with knowledge is fighting the fight we want fought. (Or both, which seems likely to me.)
If the latter, GO THAT MAN!
............
dru, no doubt, Smith has for a long time been like a PR extension of Ballmore's latest 'messaging' strategies. Accordingly, he could properly be accused of wild inconsistencies in approach - just one example during the Link era at the Reds was his regular and quite heavy critiquing of Deans and the ARU wrt to Deans, but when dealing with an even worse coach who's been just as inexplicably indulged, our own RG, his assessment has been far more mooted, unjustifiably so. Thus, the underlying pattern is clear.
It's a great pity because he's actually an intelligent and astute sports journalist when he is and can be objective and untainted by biassing 'feeder' relationships.
However, people who know Smith tell me - and this confirms your point - that even the Ballymore-tethered Smith has become aghast at RG's poor coaching, man management and attitude and further at the QRU's extraordinarily obscure and disingenuous HC 'search and selection' process that everyone suspects is none of properly pro-active (in terms of truthfully searching out the best candidates), genuine in intent (in terms of really finding the best Reds HC), open (in terms of truthfully explaining what's really going on in the process) or thorough (in terms of using rigorous selection criteria, full track record assessment, and so on).
Ballymore has relied on Smith and the sad, hapless Jim Tucker to largely trumpet the type of loyalty they want, but I think Smith may have reached his limit and so at long last we start to see mild rebukes and ironic references to QRU goings on.
Finally, it's also the case that there are now strongly varying opinions within the senior QRU hierarchy re the whole RG retention matter. After hearing with passion from almost all 2015 Reds players that RG is a dud, it's believed that the QRU CEO has finally (!) recognised that HC change is essential, but that the notoriously staunch QLD rugby old-boy network within the QRU - personified by the QRU Chairman - has, incredibly, continued to buy RG's excuses and believe he 'deserves' another chance 'free of 2015's horrendous injuries and with a younger. more supportive squad'. These differences have further muddied an already ramshackle and amateur-era-like Reds HC 'selection' process.
We should know soon enough if the QRU is sincere in its marketing of the view that it 'solely serves its stakeholders' or, as is more typical of unreformed Aus rugby elites, what this really means is that it defines itself as the most important stakeholder of all.