Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
An interesting debate going on here regarding Critique of players. Valid points on both sides.
As I have always said, critique (well founded and balanced) is essential to development and improvement.
If we accept that the players at this level are highly motivated, skilled and talented individuals (which I do generally), then one should examine the systems and training methods in use if those players consistently fail to execute the requisite skills at the level expected.
That was the basis of my critique of the Tahs here a few years ago and what Redshappy and I have opined regarding the Reds this year.
If people/fans truly want to see the advancement of their team and improvement in individuals and team outcomes they need to embrace such critique.
As I have always said, critique (well founded and balanced) is essential to development and improvement.
If we accept that the players at this level are highly motivated, skilled and talented individuals (which I do generally), then one should examine the systems and training methods in use if those players consistently fail to execute the requisite skills at the level expected.
That was the basis of my critique of the Tahs here a few years ago and what Redshappy and I have opined regarding the Reds this year.
If people/fans truly want to see the advancement of their team and improvement in individuals and team outcomes they need to embrace such critique.