qwerty51
Stirling Mortlock (74)
From the side?
He wasn't and that's not offside anyway, Bryce said offside.
From the side?
I think you will find that the mail had broken before he joined. TPN attacked the second maul. They had adv anyway because Robinson was offsideMate the yellow card might of been harsh but that was a penalty try, clearly from the side and he collapsed. Don't throw a tantrum over it, you're still 16 points ahead
http://www.sareferees.co.za/laws/laws/740086.htmHe wasn't and that's not offside anyway, Bryce said offside.
You must either join the maul or retreat but he cannot loiter alongside it then decide to join from the backfoot.I want to see more replay of that collapsed maul. If the player at the back had of broken off then TPN was within his right to have a go. It didn't appear to me that TPN was what caused the maul to collapse I think the collapse took place at the front of the maul, not the back & TPN has copped the card for a team mate that was probably more responsible but then again I want to see more replays of it to look closer at the collapse to make a better judgement of it. Would have been hard to judge in real time. Can you ask for a slo-mo replay for try no try to determine how or if a maul was even brought down in the first place or if the ball carrying team just lost their feet?
You must either join the maul or retreat but he cannot loiter alongside it then decide to join from the backfoot.
17.5 SUCCESSFUL END TO A MAUL
A maul ends successfully when the ball or a player with the ball
leaves the maul. A maul ends successfully when the ball is on the
ground, or is on or over the goal line.
This is reason Spooony why I think TPN was fine, might be wrong but I'm sure the player at the back disconnected. Happy to be proven wrong by replay, once I get to have another look.
Yes but where was he standing before joining the maul?I know about joining a maul spooony! What I wanted to have a look at was whether the Rebels player had DISCONNECTED from the maul at the back. If he did that means the maul is then over, TPN would not have to have been connected to anyone as long as he came from the hindmost feet (in bold is the part I would like to have a look at, as long as he got that bit correct he would be fine).
Yes but where was he standing before joining the maul?
Who are the NSW fans in ther debate above?Typical, you won the game comfortably, got the five points and yet you NSW fans still find something to throw a tantrum about. Get over it, it had no effect on the result.
Who are the NSW fans in ther debate above?
In Bulls country that is running rugbyThat's what I'd like to know, I thought it was just a rigorous discussion regarding one of Rugby's great wonders - the rolling maul.