T
Train Without a Station
Guest
That's because mass changes cannot be done. If you're roster isn't any good, you are stuck with them until they are under contract.
Look at the Brumbies. How many of their players were on their roster in 2010 or 2011?
Obviously you need to keep the good talent and replace the inferior. But advocating stability for the sake of it is pointless. You need to build on your good performers and at the Rebels, you could really count them on about 1 hand.
Before anybody says that about the Reds, their same players were good enough to make 3 consecutive years of finals, they have some runs on the board.
Count the promising youth the Rebels have that is improving and therefore should be expected to improve and that's probably another hand. Beyond 10 players they need to constantly turnover and increase that number of players worth keeping.
Look at the Brumbies. How many of their players were on their roster in 2010 or 2011?
Obviously you need to keep the good talent and replace the inferior. But advocating stability for the sake of it is pointless. You need to build on your good performers and at the Rebels, you could really count them on about 1 hand.
Before anybody says that about the Reds, their same players were good enough to make 3 consecutive years of finals, they have some runs on the board.
Count the promising youth the Rebels have that is improving and therefore should be expected to improve and that's probably another hand. Beyond 10 players they need to constantly turnover and increase that number of players worth keeping.