There is nothing wrong with the idea of a flat line attack, but it has to be executed with fast (repeat FAST) ruck ball. The static ball that Australian sides play with makes the tactic impossible and the receiver a tackle bag. It is why the Tahs make the ad-line 60% of the time, even when starting on that line. Yes the players appear physically weak, in comparison to their opposition in so many instances when carrying the ball, but IMO that stems from receiving it in a position of weakness, static and getting the defender attacking them in motion at the same time. It also compromises the body position.
I was prepared to give Gibson the benefit of the doubt and a clear season to see what he could bring to the table in terms of tactics and outcomes. Jury is in now. Whilst I do not like to blame outcomes totally on coaching staff, the fact that no Australian side plays with fast ball from the ruck, and the Tahs are no different the tactics Gibson has the Tahs playing every week is just plainly poor coaching, and as we have discussed repeatedly I do not think there are many real rugby brains in this Tahs team and the "leadership group" to use their term is perhaps the dumbest in rugby terms in the competition.
The refereeing performance was fine, the cards handed out were not only justified and more they are required by the directives and Laws of the game. Refereeing performance was fine and the Tahs tactics are what lost it for them, the Sharks really did offer that much.