Queensland U16 Team

[TheMan45]

he better have improved out of site, last time i saw him the state high reserve halfback was better than him

Well he definitely has. i myself got the priveledge of watching that game and i can see what you are talking about. but let me reassure you it has benn his only bad game all season. not even the best players play well every week. also i think he has huge potential he just needs the right coach and he could be a force to be reckoned with

 

[TheMan45]

What a superstar should be a certainty. Also i dont no how terrace could get a look in and aic boys not. i wouldnt be surprised if half the aic teams could beat terrace firsts not to mention there 16 a's

although terrace under 16a's have only registered 1 win against grammar they have played well all season. with the exception of the nudgee game. Although the scorelines might not suggest this but terrace 16a's have been competitive with every game. take churchie for example there openside flanker scored in the first 5 minutes. also the score at halftime was 10-7 in favor of churchie. so terrace are hardly at the same level as aic. but that is just my opinion

 

[TheMan45]

Have you watched marist play? if so what do you think about their ten, also i believe their 9 is better then the lauries one, what about padua players?

the marist 15 is good but i dont think he compares to Tom Given. also the lauries half back is better than the marist one as the lauries one is more consistent.

 

[truckitup]

the marist 15 is good but i dont think he compares to Tom Given. also the lauries half back is better than the marist one as the lauries one is more consistent.

Big call there. The marist 15 is probably one of the best U16 player in the AIC. In my opinion I would pick him over Tom Given.

 

[pfo]

truckitup bro you support ashgrove, which is practically marist buddy givens one of the best players going round dont cut him too short mate

 

[light]

pfo, people in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks. I've heard you talk up many player's chances, who aren't even close to contention.

 

[Royalderry]

The Padua 3 and 7 looked standout to me - both younger boys - 3 destroyed the Marist and SLC packs in the 2 Padua games I saw -

 

[mpete151]

I certainly see a huge significant improvement from him, the trial game against BBC was a standout performance from the no.9 Damon Bingham

if you guys say he is that good then he must have been playing some good footy as i was saying i havent seen him play in about a year but i do belive that Michael Siaki
is the best halfback in queensland

 

[pfo]

shot light, i've talked up tonnes of players hey? check out this is the only thread ive posted in and none..

 

[classicgold]

AIC competition is not to the same level of GPS,
the best 22 GPS players would thrash the best 15 AIC players,
and if u dont agree just watch the GPS1 vs AIC1 game in the opens state champs

 

[light]

AIC competition is not to the same level of GPS,
the best 22 GPS players would thrash the best 15 AIC players,
and if u dont agree just watch the GPS1 vs AIC1 game in the opens state champs

Well of course, GPS has 7 more players!
FYI 2011 State champs result.
AIC I: 33 d GPS II: 19 -(weaker team than GPS III)
GPS III: 38 d AIC II: 14.

I think GPS does have a slight lead on the AIC in terms of quality. AIC is no competition to be laughed at, the potential is there and like we've seen in the past, they will challenge GPS sooner rather than later.

 

[L-Time2011]

There is no comparison between AIC and GPS. There might be the occasional AIC player/team who can compete with the GPS boys, but very rarely. Terrace would get up over most AIC schools this year, and that's really saying something.

your joking right?

 

[jaydee]

AIC competition is not to the same level of GPS,
the best 22 GPS players would thrash the best 15 AIC players,
and if u dont agree just watch the GPS1 vs AIC1 game in the opens state champs

gps 26 aic 19 real thrashing eh ??

 

[Steve-O]

AIC competition is not to the same level of GPS,
the best 22 GPS players would thrash the best 15 AIC players,
and if u dont agree just watch the GPS1 vs AIC1 game in the opens state champs

19-0 to AIC at halftime. 26-19 to GPS fulltime. Wouldnt call it a trashing

 

[Boomboom]

1. Dan Anae
2. Robert Lawless
3. Benroy Sala
4. Adam Korczyk
5. Dan Preene
6. Henry Fitzgerald
7. Xavier Power
8. Latham Takau
9. Jack Martin
10. James Dalgleish
11. Joel Hagan, although in u15's has similar potential in making 16's like Tuttle, Anae etc
12. Jack Tuttle
13. Landon Hayes
14. Monty Ioane
15. Tom Given

Get ur facts straight champion.. Both Xavier power and Monty ioani are 17..... And why would u pick Joel Hagen over will shipperly. Also benroy altho a good player, struggled to make the Brisbane south and met east. Aron pleash or whatever is a far more consistent and fit player

 

[Boomboom]

Jack tuttle will not make queensland 16's...... He will be in Australian schoolboys

 

[light]

Jack tuttle will not make queensland 16's...... He will be in Australian schoolboys

He didn't even make QLD 1 or 2. No he wont be.

 

[Lee Grant]

He must be handy if he is eligible for U/16s this year too. He made a few breaks in the U/16 championships last year. How is he going for Nudgee?

 

[Rubboo]

1st XV inside centre. A great influence in the backline, causes constant havoc for GPS backlines with ball in hand

 

[will]

Notice all those GT players are in the first xv and have experience

what about all the churchie u16's in the firsts? they are also on top of the table, unlike terrace who are going to be the wooden spooners. I would pick a lot more churchie players than GT players...