• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Queensland Reds 2026

Nuggetyflyhalf

Allen Oxlade (6)
It's similar to the AFL where there is a fair bit of travel and you really need to finish top 2 (if you're an interstate teams).
If the Brumbs don't win this weekend they should come under the same amount of heat as the Reds.
Solid roster, Same coaching and pretty manageable injury list. If so, I'm sure we'll find the same criticism from @Tomthumb in the Brumbies thread.
Compare the Brumbies team to the Crusaders and the Chiefs. It’s probably the third strongest of the three. To question the Brumbies program (If they lose) or even compare it to the Reds is deflecting lol.
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)
I think it's harsh to squarely blame the coaching staff for our season in which we couldn't run out a first choice XV in almost every round, and it wasn't just the number of injuries but also who was injured too. That's not to completely distract from our failings but it had a massive impact.

Biggest thing I'd tweak is the size of our team. We got bullied too much at the scrum and collision this year which meant we had no option but to spread the ball and pray for a line break. Some size would help for sure.
The scrum is an interesting one - while we definitely had flaws and it was a major issue at certain points in the season, the numbers as a whole were pretty good - 3rd for scrum win %, second in % scrums won by penalty, and second lowest in % scrums lost by penalty.

From a size perspective it's pretty clear we lacked individual dominant carriers - we were around mid table there for dominant carries and no individual was breaking the line too often by force, but on the flip side our gainline success was very good (3rd in the comp) and we have built the most effective off loading game in the world, so we stand to benefit massively from the addition of one or two guys who can really bend and break the line on their own size/power. It's where I think Kerevi coming home could be a massive shot in the arm, particularly given he has some combination with a lot of the team already, through both Reds and Wallabies.
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)
The other major aspect is lineout - it ended mid table in terms of success, but there was a particularly bad period in the middle of the season where we at least lost bonus points, if not wins from it failing. Given the strength of our maul fixing that could be worth 7-10 points a game. Part of that is a cohesion issue from bringing in 2 new locks and a lot of injury driven disruption, but the loss of Blyth and Smith at once is going to complicate things there. Ideally we'll identify and sign any new locks for next year sooner rather than later and bring them in for the Super AU comp later in the year (and any other post season games we book).
 

Major Tom

Cyril Towers (30)
Losing in a semi final is not the same as losing in a Quarter Final, but it's more the manner of the loss that I will always criticize. If the Brumbies fold like a cheap suit without a plan you best believe I'll call them out for it

You guys seem to take criticism of the Reds as a personal affront. They are a professional team with really talented players and an international coach that underperformed their own expectations. It's ok to demand more and still be a fan
I'm not writing them completely off but how many lost semi-finals would that be for the Brumbies? 2 or 3 in a row? I'm not sure that's much better than the Reds. And the Crusaders QF was actually more in the balance than the scoreline suggests. 6-day turnaround, No 2nd fly with travel it was never gonna work. I'm more critical of their performance against them in season. And we should have won that fiji and canes game. Ah well.
"If you ain't first you're last"
 

Major Tom

Cyril Towers (30)
Compare the Brumbies team to the Crusaders and the Chiefs. It’s probably the third strongest of the three. To question the Brumbies program (If they lose) or even compare it to the Reds is deflecting lol.
I'm not comparing them to any of them. Ultimately, the prize is to win the title yeah? And the Brumbs finishing in the semis each year shows they're not improving either? It's obviously more nuanced than that which is why I'm not sure the Reds actually went backwards.
Personally, making the finals is probably a pass mark. I would say the Reds should be better placed next year if they can get their injuries list sorted. Some of that was due to the end of year tour which ran close to the SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) season. I doubt we're doing that every year and the end of year tour will be valuable for many of the squad members.

FYI I am hoping for a Brumbies v Blues final.
 

JRugby2

Phil Hardcastle (33)
The scrum is an interesting one - while we definitely had flaws and it was a major issue at certain points in the season, the numbers as a whole were pretty good - 3rd for scrum win %, second in % scrums won by penalty, and second lowest in % scrums lost by penalty.

From a size perspective it's pretty clear we lacked individual dominant carriers - we were around mid table there for dominant carries and no individual was breaking the line too often by force, but on the flip side our gainline success was very good (3rd in the comp) and we have built the most effective off loading game in the world, so we stand to benefit massively from the addition of one or two guys who can really bend and break the line on their own size/power. It's where I think Kerevi coming home could be a massive shot in the arm, particularly given he has some combination with a lot of the team already, through both Reds and Wallabies.
Be interesting to see what stats say re # of scrums won by PK vs previous years - as while it is likely recency bias of watching us get bopped last weekend that is skewing my opinion, generally I don't feel like our scrum was a weapon this year like those numbers suggest.
 

Tomthumb

Ken Catchpole (46)
I'm not writing them completely off but how many lost semi-finals would that be for the Brumbies? 2 or 3 in a row? I'm not sure that's much better than the Reds. And the Crusaders QF was actually more in the balance than the scoreline suggests. 6-day turnaround, No 2nd fly with travel it was never gonna work. I'm more critical of their performance against them in season. And we should have won that fiji and canes game. Ah well.
"If you ain't first you're last"
This isn't the Brumbies page so we don't have to get into it, but it would be 4 in a row. To be fair losing competitive semi finals is a tad different to getting dominated in the QF

The game didn't feel in the balance at all to be honest, the Reds own players said they didn't fire a shot until the Crusaders took their foot off the gas. I'm not saying they should have won, they were underdogs for a reason. I just think their lack of a plan in a playoff game was very evident for a 2nd straight year and should be brought up as it needs to be a point of emphasis if they want to win a title IMO
 

Major Tom

Cyril Towers (30)
This isn't the Brumbies page so we don't have to get into it, but it would be 4 in a row. To be fair losing competitive semi finals is a tad different to getting dominated in the QF

The game didn't feel in the balance at all to be honest, the Reds own players said they didn't fire a shot until the Crusaders took their foot off the gas. I'm not saying they should have won, they were underdogs for a reason. I just think their lack of a plan in a playoff game was very evident for a 2nd straight year and should be brought up as it needs to be a point of emphasis if they want to win a title IMO
Yeah, look ultimately Reds weren't good enough during the season and certainly not in the QF. But I felt like it was 12 - 0 for a while and if we could have scored might have at least given the Saders food for thought. It was pretty difficult going when we were getting penalised pretty regularly without the same help in return (can't remember when our first pen was and yes I'm aware our scrum was getting minced). Not that I want to revisit the game call but an offside defender blocking Tate around the ruck when we were inside their 22 in the first half was very frustrating. Hard to fire a shot when the ref has the safety on.
Anyways, I'm still of the belief that while the Reds didn't progress further in the tournament they didn't exactly go backwards either. Next year does hold higher expectations. Surely less rain, hopefully less injuries, more experience in key positions and ideally, less Wallaby coaching speculation. A top 2 finish is the only way forward. Need a home final.
 

Ignoto

John Hipwell (52)
just think their lack of a plan in a playoff game was very evident for a 2nd straight year and should be brought up as it needs to be a point of emphasis if they want to win a title IMO

Christ you're hung up on one game.

Throughtout the season the Reds have clearly demonstrated a plan on how they want to play. It has been the clearest we have seen since Link was here.

The lack of a game plan is apparent for a number of reasons. Who's to say if Canham or Brial didn't knock on and we go into the half 12-7 with Lynagh still on the field that the same result happens. The Reds have demonstrated they come home with a wet sail even two weeks prior against the Canes.
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)
Be interesting to see what stats say re # of scrums won by PK vs previous years - as while it is likely recency bias of watching us get bopped last weekend that is skewing my opinion, generally I don't feel like our scrum was a weapon this year like those numbers suggest.
There were some outliers in both directions, but the Highlanders game in particular really stood out as a game we were dominant in the scrums in - Fa'agase had the wood over Ma'u for ~50 minutes getting good pay and then Hodgman tapped in and turned it up to 11. Ma'u got about a minutes break about 10 minutes later before Kautai blew out his knee and then get punished for the rest of the game. Much of this with De Groot unable to do anything to balance the ledger on the other side of the scrum. That was the stand out, but I think we might have also got good pay in the second Force game and one or two others, in terms of wins by penalty. Annoyingly I don't have per match stats for that.

Pne of the flow on effects from the injuries was probably Fa'agase's form really dropping away in the back end of the season - I think he was just asked to play too much rugby (or at least too many games in a row) for where he's at and it left him as much more of a passenger towards the end, both in scrums and around the ground. I think something similiar probably happened to Nonggorr (though to a lesser degree) with him putting in succesive, big, 60-80 minute shifts in the final weeks of the season. That's the unfortunate collateral damage of prop injuries - you end up asking a lot more of the guys who are left than you'd initially planned to.
 

Strewthcobber

Michael Lynagh (62)
The other major aspect is lineout - it ended mid table in terms of success, but there was a particularly bad period in the middle of the season where we at least lost bonus points, if not wins from it failing. Given the strength of our maul fixing that could be worth 7-10 points a game. Part of that is a cohesion issue from bringing in 2 new locks and a lot of injury driven disruption, but the loss of Blyth and Smith at once is going to complicate things there. Ideally we'll identify and sign any new locks for next year sooner rather than later and bring them in for the Super AU comp later in the year (and any other post season games we book).
Look at the correlation between lineout success and LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) not playing. It's quite concerning for the Wallabies

Also Harry Wilson - 4 lineout takes all year. I bet Schmidt wishes he was used a bit more than that!
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)
Look at the correlation between lineout success and LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) not playing. It's quite concerning for the Wallabies

Also Harry Wilson - 4 lineout takes all year. I bet Schmidt wishes he was used a bit more than that!
It's somewhat concerning, but I don't think he's a terrible lineout forward and has shown strength there in the past (though mixed throughout his career). I have a feeling part of the issue is Salakaia-Loto coming in generally coincided with a lot of change elsewhere in the pack - there were multiple injuries at hooker, prop and in in the back row throughout that period. He was also coming off the least amount of time with the team given his wallaby commitments and early injury, but I'm not sure how much that would've set him back given his background playing with most of the pack.

Salakaia-Loto's bigger issue at lineout time has always been maul defence, but I don't have per game stats for how we were or he was in that regard this year. Anecdotally I seem to remember him stuffing up there a couple of times though.
 

Adam84

John Eales (66)
Look at the correlation between lineout success and LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) not playing. It's quite concerning for the Wallabies

Also Harry Wilson - 4 lineout takes all year. I bet Schmidt wishes he was used a bit more than that!
That was one of the strangest things I found also, but I also think they chopped and changed the locks and back-row that much it’s hard to find the common denominator..
 
  • Like
Reactions: dru
Top