Both teams were offside, and often. Why, oh why, doesn't rugby borrow from soccer and have the TJ/ARs stand on the offside line and call it?
Power was a fair cleanout
By what logic? Was the ball out of the ruck when he moved to clean out Power? If it was, it was a clear case of obstruction because the ruck would have been over as soon as the ball came out. If not, Messam was clearly offside as he would have taken Power out either in front of the back feet of the Chiefs ruck, or by entering a ruck from the (wrong) side if you believe Power was bound and part of the ruck.
No way that was a legitimate try, and if left unchallenged will have dire consequences for all defending teams when rucks are formed close to the tryline. Simply have a hard runner stay to the side of the ruck and then get him to take out the closest defender to the side of the ruck so that the halfback or pick and driver can simply follow him through into the space created over the tryline.
Think anyone who thought it was ok should contemplate their reaction if such an action occurred against their favoured team.
Yeah, nah
Ball was in ruck, Power was half arsed loitering (hanging barely on so he had a head start in close defense) He got cleaned out.
If he wasn't bound to the ruck he was consciously off side in the red zone, advantage Chiefs, try, then yellow card after the try was scored.
If this view prevails in official circles, then Pandora's box has been opened.
If this view prevails in official circles, then Pandora's box has been opened.
How so?
I don't see this as a controversial decision whatsoever.
It would only be non-controversial if Power was definitely off side and not a member of the ruck. Haven't been able to see the replay and have made my comments on how I saw the episode in real time. Maybe someone can post a short video that might help to put the matter to bed.
Where I do agree with you is that if Leon only had a hand on the ruck, then he was not bound (remember the debate about whether Moore was bound to the ruck or not when Quirk was penalised for holding him). The question then is where Power was standing in relation to the back feet of the ruck and the tryline. Going back to the French test, he only had to have part of one foot behind the back of the ruck to be on side. Also, if he had part of a foot behind the tryline he would be onside.
If he was offside (and I don't recall Joubert indicating advantage), then it is probable that there should have been a penalty to the Chiefs. But the try should not have been awarded because it resulted from a clear breach by Messam, taking out a player off the ball and creating obstruction for TKB to score the try. That is where I see P's box being opened if teams (and here I have to say I really mean NZ teams) see an opportunity to create space on the tryline before a ruck is completed to allow either the halfback or a forward picking and driving to score a try by obstructing the defence whether or not it is onside itself. Could also spread to taking out the pillars at the ruck who are invariably in front of the last feet in the ruck when the halfback is preparing for a box kick.
I do believe that Joubert probably thought he had interfered with Nic White and instinctively awarded the try to avoid his embarrassment. In any case, this was certainly imo an instance where the TMO should have been brought into the discussion.
He played for Waikato in the NPC over four years so I'm sure he was pursued by the Chiefs, seeing as he was eligible to play for the All Blacks (having grown up there).Hey lads, what about Henry Speight and Chiefs? I heard that he was persecuted by the Chiefs, and he could have played by ABs, one year before being eligible for the Wallaby jersey.
Is it true? The eligibility period is lower in NZ?
The Brumbies gave Henry his break, when the at time coaches at the Chiefs didn't want him. Once he got his chance his a loyal bloke so there was no heading back. I think he will be a Brumby for life.He played for Waikato in the NPC over four years so I'm sure he was pursued by the Chiefs, seeing as he was eligible to play for the All Blacks (having grown up there).
The IRB eligibility rules are the same for all countries, though.
Hey lads, what about Henry Speight and Chiefs? I heard that he was persecuted by the Chiefs,
So this whole time BR has been arguing vehemently based only from what he saw live at the ground?
It probably helps the rest of our arguments that we got to see plenty of replays and the consensus of the commentary team was that Power was part of the ruck and the clean out was fine.