Quade Cooper Stuffs a Career

[rugbywhisperer]

I've never kicked down a door. I find it hard to believe Quade thought doing that to a mates front door was ok.

rugby whisperer - I said the Oxford English Dictionary.

Sorry, legal people in my circle use Butterworths or Websters.
Cheers

 

[Pfitzy]

Both of those have more words for "sue".

 

[fatprop]

I don't know, I can kind of see that. I guess it's kind of unfair that to play rugby at this level the ARU has to be in every facet of your live making sure you don't do anything silly.

Why, if one of my employees was charged with burglary, I would have to consider my options

 

[TOCC]

when i was living in some condos which were all duplicate copies of each other a few years back, i got home smashed one night and walked into the wrong one, walked into the room which i thought was mine only to find that there was no bed there, it took me a solid 30min of just standing there to figure out that it wasnt my room..

another time when i was living in some apartments i woke up in the utility closet only wearing jeans and a singlet, and had lost my phone, wallet and keys... turned out i had gone home, got undressed, chucked my keys, wallet and phone on the table but then for some reason i walked out of my apartment with the door locking behind me, i must have figured the utility closet was a good place to sleep it off

havent broken in any where before though

 

[Biffo]

all duplicate copies of each other

tautology of the month

 

[spectator]

I've never kicked down a door. I find it hard to believe Quade thought doing that to a mates front door was ok.

rugby whisperer - I said the Oxford English Dictionary.

Sorry, legal people in my circle use Butterworths or Websters.
Cheers

Is one of them defending Quade?

 

[rugbywhisperer]

]RW, an anonymous shitfight is not my thing, but I can't let this go too easily.

Your condemnation of other posters replies to you got my goat up.

If you cannot see the assumptive (as defined by Webster) nature of your comments, then fine.

I had my rant and i'm over it. Lets' agree to disagree.

Thats a load of bullshit - I called you to task and you either can't or won't answer my question - again - where did I say anything other than a personal opinion or a published common knowledge fact.

 

[Sully]

Born to be a lawyer!

 

[spectator]

]RW, an anonymous shitfight is not my thing, but I can't let this go too easily.

Your condemnation of other posters replies to you got my goat up.

If you cannot see the assumptive (as defined by Webster) nature of your comments, then fine.

I had my rant and i'm over it. Lets' agree to disagree.

Thats a load of bullshit - I called you to task and you either can't or won't answer my question - again - where did I say anything other than a personal opinion or a published common knowledge fact.

The bolded bit. Take a chill pill and move on.

 

[Scarfman]

Awesome argument guys.

 

[Pfitzy]

Yep. Hope your handbags are alright

 

[rugbywhisperer]

]RW, an anonymous shitfight is not my thing, but I can't let this go too easily.

Your condemnation of other posters replies to you got my goat up.

If you cannot see the assumptive (as defined by Webster) nature of your comments, then fine.

I had my rant and i'm over it. Lets' agree to disagree.

Thats a load of bullshit - I called you to task and you either can't or won't answer my question - again - where did I say anything other than a personal opinion or a published common knowledge fact.

The bolded bit. Take a chill pill and move on.

Ah - the Pauline Hanson answer - slag someone and then refuse to substantiate when challenged.

 

[Scarfman]

Let's just agree that any argument that refers to the OED should go into our "Backs' Forum" and be solved with handbags at dawn.

 

[spectator]

]RW, an anonymous shitfight is not my thing, but I can't let this go too easily.

Your condemnation of other posters replies to you got my goat up.

If you cannot see the assumptive (as defined by Webster) nature of your comments, then fine.

I had my rant and i'm over it. Lets' agree to disagree.

Thats a load of bullshit - I called you to task and you either can't or won't answer my question - again - where did I say anything other than a personal opinion or a published common knowledge fact.

The bolded bit. Take a chill pill and move on.

Ah - the Pauline Hanson answer - slag someone and then refuse to substantiate when challenged.

I've found it to be the best form of defence when countering Pauline Hanson style obstinance. :lmao:

You win - you get an answer.... I tend to think that a lot of personal opinion has its basis in assumption.

"That would be enough to pretty well take him out of selection for a while".

"I suppose it now means we have to redraft those teams for the Reds for next year though".

Just two of the opinions you have put forward in this thread. Only my opinion but there seems to be more than just a hint of assumption in those two statements. If you don't think so, then fine.

Can we move on or will it be handbags at dawn?

 

[Lee Grant]

Maybe kiss and make up?

 

[spectator]

Maybe kiss and make up?

Happy to.

 

[Scarfman]

Eww.

 

[rugbywhisperer]

]RW, an anonymous shitfight is not my thing, but I can't let this go too easily.

Your condemnation of other posters replies to you got my goat up.

If you cannot see the assumptive (as defined by Webster) nature of your comments, then fine.

I had my rant and i'm over it. Lets' agree to disagree.

Thats a load of bullshit - I called you to task and you either can't or won't answer my question - again - where did I say anything other than a personal opinion or a published common knowledge fact.

The bolded bit. Take a chill pill and move on.

Ah - the Pauline Hanson answer - slag someone and then refuse to substantiate when challenged.

I've found it to be the best form of defence when countering Pauline Hanson style obstinance. :lmao:

You win - you get an answer.... I tend to think that a lot of personal opinion has its basis in assumption.

"That would be enough to pretty well take him out of selection for a while".

"I suppose it now means we have to redraft those teams for the Reds for next year though".

Just two of the opinions you have put forward in this thread. Only my opinion but there seems to be more than just a hint of assumption in those two statements. If you don't think so, then fine.

Can we move on or will it be handbags at dawn?

That's brilliant - an argument as opposed to mere gain saying.
Thanks and we have moved on.
Cheers.

 

[Lee Grant]

all duplicate copies of each other

tautology of the month

Sheer class - how does he do it?

 

[Biffo]

all duplicate copies of each other

tautology of the month

Sheer class - how does he do it?

by repeatedly reiterating the same words