Getting a bit off topic here but daycares are not the easy win you seem to be painting them as. There are significant traffic burdens associated with them (parking requirements for pickup/drop off can cause all sorts of trouble too) and if they are at all sizable they have a habit of seeing heavy opposition amongst local residents as a result. As far as I'm aware Ashgrove isn't exactly lacking for daycare places either.I dunno Phil, given the location of some clubs, I think they're in a fantastic spot to replicate something similar to Wests.
Using GPS as an example, it's in the heart of family land. Why not do a rebuild and incorporate a Daycare / Kindy. Chuck in some GP doctor suites and you can cater from Birth to Death at the club.
These are two areas which aren't really going to be hugely impacted by vacancies. It is extremely difficult to find a good daycare centre and with an aging population, we need more and more health services.
Work with the brothers to help in the Daycare centre and you've got first dibs on exposing 6+ month year olds to join the Gallopers.
I would imagine the hardest part will be the capital raising side and that may require stakeholders with deep pockets (which we know the Church has).
The glue factory at 3pm in winter, for exampleGetting a bit off topic here but daycares are not the easy win you seem to be painting them as. There are significant traffic burdens associated with them (parking requirements for pickup/drop off can cause all sorts of trouble too) and if they are at all sizable they have a habit of seeing heavy opposition amongst local residents as a result. As far as I'm aware Ashgrove isn't exactly lacking for daycare places either.
Wests are in a heritage park but had the backing of the local councillor and state and federal members. They are the benchmark on a club development as they are a facility that does not rely on gambling to be viable.Yep, the Ashgrove Mafia won't be letting anything happen at GPS any time soon.
In my earlier post regarding location of clubs, a large part of that is also the particular zoning requirements. I had nothing to do with Wests build but I imagine they were already in the correct zone for the type of commercial establishments that were being implemented.
Easts and Souths feels like another example of being in a terrible location within a great suburb. Club house is smack bang in the middle of a park with little to no access to it for a large number of prospective tenants or their customers who need to travel through quite suburban streets.Wests are in a heritage park but had the backing of the local councillor and state and federal members. They are the benchmark on a club development as they are a facility that does not rely on gambling to be viable.
Souths are in the same style of park and have a local councillor who is totally against that club so have difficulty doing anything at all. State and federal members are on side but are hamstrung by the local councillor.
Easts could get what they wanted done due to the Deputy mayor being a local. state and federal members are on side.
What do Stowers and Manenti see in USA rugby that the rest of us don't?
Think it's just noting the opinion of Grant Andersen rather than presenting an argument.That article is pretty bizarre honestly.
It alludes to Stowers being snubbed by Super Rugby franchises, but then essentially implies he isn't good enough for a Japanese contract yet and needs to play some professional footy in the MLR to boost his stock.
Why would Super Rugby clubs be interested in a bloke that even the Japanese comp won't offer a deal?
The Deputy Major is the club patron at Easts - a handy contact for Easts when dealing with BCC who are the landlord of Bottomley. All clubs need to work closely with the political members in the local area.Wests are in a heritage park but had the backing of the local councillor and state and federal members. They are the benchmark on a club development as they are a facility that does not rely on gambling to be viable.
Souths are in the same style of park and have a local councillor who is totally against that club so have difficulty doing anything at all. State and federal members are on side but are hamstrung by the local councillor.
Easts could get what they wanted done due to the Deputy mayor being a local. state and federal members are on side.
You're right. I missed the criteria element that in order to be offered an Super Rugby contract, you have to be offered a Japanese one - BUT - there WAS the Panasonic Knights deal he was offered in late 2023 (when he was named in the Reds Challenger series), but had to decline both due to family commitments. He also declined a call up for the Aussie 7s in Sydney against Japan at the same time, for the same reason. Then there was the Rebels collapse that filled up a gaggle of available contracts here and overseas in the meantime so, when he was clear to take offers, they were utilised by off-contract Rebels. So, within context, maybe accepting an MLR gig (under a coach that was keen to see him play in his national 7s side) may not be as bizarre as you might think. As an Aussie rugby fan, I'm more worried that we see him turn out for NZ, Samoa or even the USA and do what the likes of Hansen, Lowe, Tuipolotu - and so many others have done....play a key part in beating the team he was keen to represent, but was not retained for...That article is pretty bizarre honestly.
It alludes to Stowers being snubbed by Super Rugby franchises, but then essentially implies he isn't good enough for a Japanese contract yet and needs to play some professional footy in the MLR to boost his stock.
Why would Super Rugby clubs be interested in a bloke that even the Japanese comp won't offer a deal?
...and we end up being on the receiving end when they turn out for other countries, despite the fact we have a multi-million dollar Kiwi coach and a multimillion-dollar league player at hand. Imagine what might have happened if those millions were spent on retaining those players who are scoring tries against us.Stowers isn't the only one being left on the shelf by RA / Super Rugby.
This is just another cry for a 3rd tier of professional (semi professional) rugby in Australia or an expanded Aussie Super rugby capacity.
We lose too many good talents because we dont have spots for them.
You're right. I missed the criteria element that in order to be offered an Super Rugby contract, you have to be offered a Japanese one - BUT - here WAS the Panasonic Knights deal he was offered in late 2023 (when he was named in the Reds Challenger series), but had to decline both due to family commitments. He also declined a call up for the Aussie 7s in Sydney against Japan at the same time, for the same reason. Then there was the Rebels collapse that filled up a gaggle of available contracts here and overseas in the meantime so, when he was clear to take offers, they were utilised by off-contract Rebels. So, within context, maybe accepting an MLR gig (under a coach that was keen to see him play in his national 7s side) may not be as bizarre as you might think. As an Aussie rugby fan, I'm more worried that we see him turn out for NZ, Samoa or even the USA and do what the likes of Hansen, Lowe, Tuipolotu - and so many others have done....play a key part in beating the team he was keen to represent, but was not retained for...
Merely adding context, champ. No need to see it as an attack. I added supporting information to help you understand that context. If Panasonic Knights and Aussie 7s are interested, then why not Super Rugby? A modicum of clarity. That's all. If you read up relevant media on other players like Eli Pils, Matt Gicguel and Kohan Herbert - other evergreen QPR performers that also tend to be snubbed - Stowers' story ain't so bizarre. It does, however, add to the overarching issue of the Wallabies being beaten by international teams comprising Australian players that have been snubbed by Australian Rugby and/or Super Rugby franchises. And therein lies the more likely ulterior motive behind the article - and the original post - maybe? Cheers 'Boss'.Wooo up boss.
His coach is trying to spruik him as Super Rugby ready and what a shame it is to lose him, but then the player by his own admission says he needs to cut his teeth in the MLR before trying to crack the Japanese league.
So what is it? Should he be starting for the Reds next year or playing 3rd grade level rugby in San Diego?
I also don't see why you're bringing up family commitments when they weren't mentioned in the original article at all? But you seem to think they hold importance to his story.
Apologies if you're the author of the article but I think it's a bit strange to follow and doesn't give a clear indication of what level this bloke should be playing at, that's just my opinion.