Any standout players from the various matches? New players making a mark?
Jono Kent apparently fitting in quite well down at Brothers, sounds like Adams could be out for a while so Jono should get a decent crack in the starting 15. Will be interesting to see what happens with Creighton/JOC (James O'Connor) (James O'Connor) in the Reds over the next few weeks, Kent may finally get to play flyhalf after leaving GPS and getting shafted at Wests (which is fair enough with the players there).
I'm expecting GPS to fire after the Easter break. Sounds like the Fiji trip was a bit too much fun for some of the boys, has taken them a while to come back down to earth. 2 weeks off and some heavy sessions will have them sorted out though.
Wests scored 6 tries - 4 by the forwards and 2 from their captain (centre).
I am over rolling maul tries. They’ve taken over the game and the referees go into a mode where they only referee the defensive side looking for fault. How many finish in penalties, yellow cards or pushover tries? I think it’s a blight on rugby and laws need to be adjusted.
Sounds like a you problem. QRRA would be happy to have you down at an education session to learn how this part of the game is referreedFair point SX - I agree it’s part of rugby but is now an opaque tactic that the average fan has no clue what is legal and what is not. A bit like scrums I suppose.
Sounds like a you problem. QRRA would be happy to have you down at an education session to learn how this part of the game is referreed
Do they know? I am not sure it is done consistently. You could line up 3 referees to watch a rolling maul and have 3 different decisions.Sounds like a you problem. QRRA would be happy to have you down at an education session to learn how this part of the game is referreed
You could say that about any aspect of the game..... rulings at rucks, scrums or high tackles all vary from referee to referee.Do they know? I am not sure it is done consistently. You could line up 3 referees to watch a rolling maul and have 3 different decisions.
Must be a nightmare for coaches.
Definitely not a valid discussion point if the crux of the argument is based on a frivolous and baseless attack on community referees and definitely deserves to be shut down.Sounds like a valid discussion point, don't be so quick to shut someone down. The maul has gone through a few law changes during it's lifespan e.g. the ball now being transferred via hands to the back instead of the ball carrier being able to slide themselves to the back.
Be good if the peanut gallery could support these claims with genuine, evidence-based commentary rather than side mouth dribble after their team has been dominated by a good rolling maul. If you don't understand how something works - just say so.
So true.You've come to an anonymous rugby forum, if you want genuine, evidence-based commentary, you've come to the wrong place.