What?Ref just guessing. Collapsing instantly. Could be anyone.
Seriously. This is incredible referring. Instant collapses but it's either a Wests penalty or a reset. Yeah right.
Not refereeing each scrum on it's merits.
How can you give a penalty try on an instant collapse? The one before the eventual try would've been a pen try if they infringed whilst going backwards but there was no infringement.What?
I’m a neutral and that should have been a penalty try everyday of the week.
He was playing advantage - he penalised UQ enough to give a yellow card.How can you give a penalty try on an instant collapse? The one before the eventual try would've been a pen try if they infringed whilst going backwards but there was no infringement.
On the hit? Why was the referee resetting some and gifting instant penalties when the collapsed was on the hit.I’m not convinced a penalty try was deserved but ever penalty seemed fair. Zander and Sef were collapsing repeatedly
Yeah, I'm not sure how to the letter of the law that sequence was, but I think the overall result of those scrums was correct. A penalty try there would've been a pretty hollow result.I’m not convinced a penalty try was deserved but ever penalty seemed fair. Zander and Sef were collapsing repeatedly
Wasn’t a penalty try because Skelton knocked on at the back of the scrum, but they were playing advantage.He was playing advantage - he penalised UQ enough to give a yellow card.
Penalty try was warranted IMO
Well one penalty was for dropping to knees, another was angle, then a couple of resets so can’t really argue with the Refs call.So what other outcome was there if Skelton hadn’t have knocked on?