Cat_A
Arch Winning (36)
Tigers Tale I looked at the Premier competition rules as a favour to a mate who is from GPS and as they are written (particularly the punctuation they've used) it is ambiguous.
http://www.redsrugby.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=I0Yw8gNrc4c=&tabid=533
I'd say what has upset GPS is that the rule says ARU/QRU contracted players are eligible (if the the / means OR, as is customary) , and while Hegarty plays for the VRU-aligned Rebels he has never been associated with another club.
BUT
knowing now that the appeal was rejected, I think the QRU looks at Hegarty as a non-contracted player (because he is not contracted to the QRU) so he would've needed to play more than 6 games for the club to be eligible OR apply for dispensation two weeks ago.
http://www.redsrugby.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=I0Yw8gNrc4c=&tabid=533
I'd say what has upset GPS is that the rule says ARU/QRU contracted players are eligible (if the the / means OR, as is customary) , and while Hegarty plays for the VRU-aligned Rebels he has never been associated with another club.
BUT
knowing now that the appeal was rejected, I think the QRU looks at Hegarty as a non-contracted player (because he is not contracted to the QRU) so he would've needed to play more than 6 games for the club to be eligible OR apply for dispensation two weeks ago.