Really? Whats an example or reference of thatThis year showed more than ever that even the best u15 players in the comp still find it difficult to shine against, bigger, stronger and faster senior boys. It's as simple as that
Firstly your writing is all over the place to the point that its difficult to understand, you probably just need to calm down and before you press submit read through what you have written...
Ok, GT as pointed out have an immersion program that affects their 15s rugby program its been well documented and seems like everyone apart from yourself seem to know this, it affects the results in their 15s and in doing so lifts (inflates) the results of other schools, what B & G is saying is that in his opinion BSHS was one of the schools that benefitted from GTs immersion program and that their 5th placing or whatever it was really isn't a true indication of what the 15 cohort have to offer.
As for BGS truth be known, there entire squad could be returning and Michael Chieka could be the Director of rugby that won't be enough to make a difference they will be bottom half of the table, no offence to the players you mention above and the 2 X 15 year old boys you mention... I really don't understand your point are the names you mention supposed quality? sorry did they play GPS1, 2 or 3 or ?
This year showed more than ever that even the best u15 players in the comp still find it difficult to shine against, bigger, stronger and faster senior boys. It's as simple as that
along with a strong bshs side
Agreed on TSS - I seriously ask what are you basing this statement on - Not that I am saying you are wrong - but their 16s where terrible and the 1stXV (not sure how many are back) didn't impress me that much in the game I saw - in fact I though GT lost that game rather than BSHS winning it.
Apart from that stunning upset at NC their results were mediocre at best.
approximately had 8 u16's by the time they played GT with 4 injuries to their best u16's. So about 12 coming back for the assault next year.
approximately had 8 u16's by the time they played GT with 4 injuries to their best u16's. So about 12 coming back for the assault next year.
Agreed on TSS - I seriously ask what are you basing this statement on - Not that I am saying you are wrong - but their 16s where terrible and the 1stXV (not sure how many are back) didn't impress me that much in the game I saw - in fact I though GT lost that game rather than BSHS winning it.
Apart from that stunning upset at NC their results were mediocre at best.
how can you say that????
watch TSS 16A'S Highlights
This TSS video does not show the match against BBC where TSS 16 A were pumped 28-5.
BBC did well to finish 3rd after losing 4 players to 1sts and 3 to injury after this match.
PS-stay tuned for a big name coach to be appointed to BBC soon.