Really??? Mot from where I sat.
BGS 10 was very ordinary and BGS were poor and GT played down to them.
BGS never once threatened to score and their inside backs did not compete inn attack at all. GT handling was terrible and they probably bombed 4-5 tries.
BGC 11 was their best.
I agree with you re BGS 10, but he had his moments, and will only improve with experience. He crabs across the field to hit runners like a league 6, and in all games I've seen with similar style flyhalves the strategy has crashed and burned. In saying that he connected well with the BGS 13 when they were crabbing.
The word that spring to my mind after watching Horan vs Sly was that Horan was a more graceful player - his passes and kicks were perfect, out in front of the chest of all receivers. I don't believe he made an error once in attack, but he didn't have a perfect all round game, to qualify as perfect I'd say he needed to make all his kicks, tackles, and impose himself on the defence by running through gaps.
Instead of BGS11, I believe you may be thinking of 14, a red head names Johnathan Traves. He was undoubtedly the best of BGS' backs.
Paddy Dooley (8) was the best player on the pitch for BGS IMO, he was just everywhere in attack and defence.
Finally, for all those that say GT have an undersized pack, they absolutely do not. Between Leofa, the hooker Fraser?, Stanley, and Isaiah Grace there is plenty of meat on the bones, and they certainly carry the smaller backrow
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk