Possibly, GPS3 did have a few week spots by the end of the day with some subs not quit up to the game, but their scrum was dominant (two tight head wins straight up). Dempsey organised well, (he'd have to be disappointed at not getting a place in a squad) and I though GPS3 better at the breakdown. It did look to me that GPS1 were more likely to score when they had the ball but that GPS2 won more ball and contested harder for it.
What I sore was a GP3 team that if they had there full team from start to finish I believe they would off come out on top of GPS1/GP2, GPS3 forward pack destroyed the GPS1 pack in the first half pushing them off the mark every time.
Second half sore coaches/selectors start bringing on boys from GPS2 and also taking key players from GP3 and placing them on the field for GPS1 because they where getting dealt too.